Mao Sun-Zhong, Ye Xiaobing, Liu Gang, Song Dongmei, Liu Shu Fang
Centers for Heart and Lung Research, and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, U.S.A.
Institute of Hypoxia Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 Jul;35(7):1635-1644. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.305519. Epub 2015 May 14.
Disruption of endothelial barrier integrity is a characteristic of many inflammatory conditions. However, the origin and function of endothelial cells (ECs) restoring endothelial barrier function remain unknown. This study defined the roles of resident ECs (RECs) and bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (BMDEPCs) in endothelial barrier restoration after endotoxemic lung injury.
We generated mice that enable to quantify proliferating RECs or BMDEPCs and also to study the causal link between REC or BMDEPC proliferation and endothelial barrier restoration. Using these mouse models, we showed that endothelial barrier restoration was associated with increased REC and BMDEPC proliferation. RECs and BMDEPCs participate in barrier repair. Immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that RECs proliferate in situ on endothelial layer and that BMDEPCs are engrafted into endothelial layer of lung microvessels at the active barrier repair phase. In lungs, 8 weeks after lipopolysaccharide-induced injury, the number of REC-derived ECs (CD45(-)/CD31(+)/BrdU(+)/rtTA(+)) or BMDEPC-derived ECs (CD45(-)/CD31(+)/eNOS(+)/GFP(+)) increased by 22- or 121-fold, respectively. The suppression of REC or BMDEPC proliferation by blocking REC or BMDEPC intrinsic nuclear factor-κB at the barrier repair phase was associated with an augmented endothelial permeability and impeded endothelial barrier recovery. RECs and BMDEPCs contributed differently to endothelial barrier repair. In lungs, 8 weeks after lipopolysaccharide-induced injury, REC-derived ECs constituted 22%, but BMDEPC-derived ECs constituted only 3.7% of the total new ECs.
REC is a major and BMDEPC is a complementary source of new ECs in endothelial barrier restoration. RECs and BMDEPCs play important roles in endothelial barrier restoration after inflammatory lung injury.
内皮屏障完整性的破坏是许多炎症性疾病的一个特征。然而,恢复内皮屏障功能的内皮细胞(ECs)的来源和功能仍不清楚。本研究确定了内毒素血症性肺损伤后驻留内皮细胞(RECs)和骨髓来源的内皮祖细胞(BMDEPCs)在内皮屏障恢复中的作用。
我们构建了能够量化增殖的RECs或BMDEPCs的小鼠模型,还能够研究RECs或BMDEPCs增殖与内皮屏障恢复之间的因果关系。使用这些小鼠模型,我们发现内皮屏障的恢复与RECs和BMDEPCs增殖增加有关。RECs和BMDEPCs参与屏障修复。免疫荧光染色显示,RECs在内皮层原位增殖,而BMDEPCs在活跃的屏障修复阶段植入肺微血管的内皮层。在脂多糖诱导损伤8周后的肺组织中,RECs来源的内皮细胞(CD45(-)/CD31(+)/BrdU(+)/rtTA(+))或BMDEPCs来源的内皮细胞(CD45(-)/CD31(+)/eNOS(+)/GFP(+))数量分别增加了22倍或121倍。在屏障修复阶段,通过阻断RECs或BMDEPCs的内在核因子-κB来抑制RECs或BMDEPCs增殖,与内皮通透性增加和内皮屏障恢复受阻有关。RECs和BMDEPCs对内皮屏障修复的贡献不同。在脂多糖诱导损伤8周后的肺组织中,RECs来源的内皮细胞占新增内皮细胞总数的22%,而BMDEPCs来源的内皮细胞仅占3.7%。
在内皮屏障恢复过程中,RECs是新内皮细胞的主要来源,BMDEPCs是补充来源。RECs和BMDEPCs在炎症性肺损伤后的内皮屏障恢复中起重要作用。