Creed F, Anthony P, Godbert K, Huxley P
University Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary.
Br J Psychiatry. 1989 Mar;154:341-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.154.3.341.
Severity of psychiatric illness was assessed using standardised clinical and social measures in 69 in-patients and 41 day patients admitted consecutively from the community. Day and in-patients differed little in terms of psychiatric symptoms and social disability, especially if compulsory admissions were excluded. Protection of self or others was a common reason for in-patient admission given by clinicians, who were otherwise prepared to treat seriously ill patients in the day hospital. Very few of the day patients had to be transferred to the in-patient facility, and at three months and one year the two groups showed similar improvements. It is concluded that day treatment is feasible for some seriously ill psychiatric patients, but a random-allocation study is required to assess more completely the efficacy of day treatment, and define the characteristics of those who require in-patient admission.
采用标准化临床和社会测量方法,对69名住院患者以及41名从社区连续收治的日间患者的精神疾病严重程度进行了评估。日间患者和住院患者在精神症状和社会残疾方面差异不大,尤其是排除强制入院的情况后。保护自己或他人是临床医生给出的住院治疗常见理由,否则他们愿意在日间医院治疗重症患者。很少有日间患者需要转至住院部,在三个月和一年时,两组患者的改善情况相似。结论是,日间治疗对一些重症精神疾病患者可行,但需要进行随机分配研究,以更全面地评估日间治疗的疗效,并明确需要住院治疗患者的特征。