Mitchell Chelsea L, Yeager Roger D, Johnson Zachary J, D'Annunzio Stephanie E, Vogel Kara R, Werner Thomas
Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, United States of America.
Department of Experimental and Systems Pharmacology, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0127569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127569. eCollection 2015.
Insect resistance to toxins exerts not only a great impact on our economy, but also on the ecology of many species. Resistance to one toxin is often associated with cross-resistance to other, sometimes unrelated, chemicals. In this study, we investigated mushroom toxin resistance in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen). This fruit fly species does not feed on mushrooms in nature and may thus have evolved cross-resistance to α-amanitin, the principal toxin of deadly poisonous mushrooms, due to previous pesticide exposure. The three Asian D. melanogaster stocks used in this study, Ama-KTT, Ama-MI, and Ama-KLM, acquired α-amanitin resistance at least five decades ago in their natural habitats in Taiwan, India, and Malaysia, respectively. Here we show that all three stocks have not lost the resistance phenotype despite the absence of selective pressure over the past half century. In response to α-amanitin in the larval food, several signs of developmental retardation become apparent in a concentration-dependent manner: higher pre-adult mortality, prolonged larva-to-adult developmental time, decreased adult body size, and reduced adult longevity. In contrast, female fecundity nearly doubles in response to higher α-amanitin concentrations. Our results suggest that α-amanitin resistance has no fitness cost, which could explain why the resistance has persisted in all three stocks over the past five decades. If pesticides caused α-amanitin resistance in D. melanogaster, their use may go far beyond their intended effects and have long-lasting effects on ecosystems.
昆虫对毒素产生抗性不仅对我们的经济有重大影响,而且对许多物种的生态也有影响。对一种毒素的抗性通常与对其他(有时是不相关的)化学物质的交叉抗性相关。在本研究中,我们调查了果蝇(Drosophila melanogaster,Meigen)对蘑菇毒素的抗性。这种果蝇在自然环境中不以蘑菇为食,因此可能由于先前接触过杀虫剂而对致命毒蘑菇的主要毒素α-鹅膏菌素产生了交叉抗性。本研究中使用的三个亚洲果蝇品系,即Ama-KTT、Ama-MI和Ama-KLM,分别于至少五十年前在台湾、印度和马来西亚的自然栖息地获得了α-鹅膏菌素抗性。我们在此表明,尽管在过去半个世纪中没有选择压力,但所有这三个品系都没有丧失抗性表型。在幼虫食物中添加α-鹅膏菌素后,几种发育迟缓的迹象以浓度依赖的方式变得明显:成虫前死亡率更高、幼虫到成虫的发育时间延长、成虫体型减小以及成虫寿命缩短。相比之下,较高浓度的α-鹅膏菌素会使雌果蝇的繁殖力几乎翻倍。我们的结果表明,α-鹅膏菌素抗性没有适应性代价,这可以解释为什么在过去五十年中,这三个品系的抗性一直存在。如果杀虫剂导致了果蝇对α-鹅膏菌素的抗性,那么它们的使用可能远远超出预期效果,并对生态系统产生长期影响。