Koo Kyo Chul, Park Sang Un, Rha Koon Ho, Hong Sung Joon, Yang Seung Choul, Hong Chang Hee, Chung Byung Ha
Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug;45(8):785-90. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv073. Epub 2015 May 15.
To investigate whether transurethral resection of the prostate can be used as both (i) treatment for symptomatic prostatic enlargement in patients with prostate cancer and (ii) a risk-adaptive strategy for reducing prostate-specific antigen levels and broadening the indications of active surveillance.
We retrospectively reviewed data of 3680 patients who underwent prostate biopsies at a single institution (March 2006 to January 2012). Of 529 men who had Gleason score 6 prostate cancer and were ineligible for active surveillance, 86 (16.3%) underwent transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic enlargement. We assessed how changes in prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density influenced the eligibility for active surveillance and the outcome of subsequent therapy. The following active surveillance criteria were used: prostate-specific antigen ≤ 10 ng/ml, prostate-specific antigen density ≤ 0.15, positive cores ≤ 3 and single core involvement ≤ 50%.
The median age, pre-operative prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume were 71 years, 6.95 ng/ml, and 45.8 g, respectively. In 82.6% (71/86) of analyzed cases, ineligibility for active surveillance had resulted from elevated prostate-specific antigen level or prostate-specific antigen density. With a median resection of 16.5 g, transurethral resection of the prostate reduced the percentage of prostate-specific antigen and the percentage of prostate-specific antigen density by 34.5 and 50.0%, respectively, making 81.7% (58/71) of the patients eligible for active surveillance. Prostate-specific antigen level remained stabilized in all (21/21) patients maintained on active surveillance without disease progression during the median follow-up of 50.6 months. Among patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, 96.7% (29/30) exhibited localized disease.
Risk-adaptive transurethral resection of the prostate may prevent overtreatment and allay prostate-specific antigen-associated anxiety in patients with biopsy-proven low-grade prostate cancer and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Additional benefits include voiding symptom improvement and the avoidance of curative therapy's immediate side effects.
探讨经尿道前列腺切除术是否可用于(i)治疗前列腺癌患者有症状的前列腺增生,以及(ii)作为一种风险适应性策略,以降低前列腺特异性抗原水平并扩大主动监测的适应症。
我们回顾性分析了在单一机构(2006年3月至2012年1月)接受前列腺活检的3680例患者的数据。在529例Gleason评分6分的前列腺癌患者中,86例(16.3%)因有症状的前列腺增生而接受了经尿道前列腺切除术,这些患者不符合主动监测的条件。我们评估了前列腺特异性抗原和前列腺特异性抗原密度的变化如何影响主动监测的资格以及后续治疗的结果。采用以下主动监测标准:前列腺特异性抗原≤10 ng/ml,前列腺特异性抗原密度≤0.15,阳性活检芯≤3个,单芯受累≤50%。
患者的中位年龄、术前前列腺特异性抗原和前列腺体积分别为71岁、6.95 ng/ml和45.8 g。在82.6%(71/86)的分析病例中,不符合主动监测条件是由于前列腺特异性抗原水平或前列腺特异性抗原密度升高。经尿道前列腺切除术的中位切除量为16.5 g,前列腺特异性抗原百分比和前列腺特异性抗原密度百分比分别降低了34.5%和50.0%,使81.7%(58/71)的患者符合主动监测条件。在中位随访50.6个月期间,所有(21/21)接受主动监测且无疾病进展的患者前列腺特异性抗原水平保持稳定。在接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者中,96.7%(29/30)表现为局限性疾病。
风险适应性经尿道前列腺切除术可能避免过度治疗,并减轻活检证实为低级别前列腺癌且前列腺特异性抗原升高患者与前列腺特异性抗原相关的焦虑。其他益处包括改善排尿症状以及避免根治性治疗的即时副作用。