Wu Chun-Te, Huang Yun-Ching, Chen Wen-Cheng, Chen Miao-Fen
Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 204, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 131, Taiwan.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 29;13(1):74. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010074.
Regarding localized prostate cancer (PC), questions remain regarding which patients are appropriate candidates for conservative management. Some localized PC was an incidental finding in patients who received transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for urinary symptoms. It is known that TURP usually affects the level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). In the present study, we examined whether changes in PSA levels after TURP possess a predictive value for localized PC. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 846 early-stage PC patients who underwent TURP for urinary symptoms upon diagnosis at our hospital. Of 846 patients, 687 had tumor involvement in TURP specimens, and 362 had post-TURP PSA assessment. Our data revealed that, in addition to low GS and PSA levels at diagnosis, ≤5% tumor involvement in TURP specimens, greater PSA reduction (≥68%) following TURP, and post-TURP PSA ≤ 4 were significantly associated with better progression-free survival (PFS). Survival analysis revealed that the addition of prostate-directed local therapy significantly improved PFS in intermediate- and high-risk groups, but not in the low-risk group. Moreover, in the intermediate-risk group, local therapy improved PFS only for patients who were associated with post-TURP PSA > 4 ng/mL or <68% PSA reduction following TURP. We also found that local therapy had no obvious improvement in PFS for those with post-TURP ≤ 4 ng/mL regardless of pre-TURP PSA. In conclusion, conservative management is considered for patients at low or intermediate risk who have greater PSA reduction following TURP and low post-TURP PSA. Therefore, the levels of PSA following TURP might be helpful for risk stratification and the selection of patients for conservative management.
关于局限性前列腺癌(PC),对于哪些患者适合保守治疗仍存在疑问。一些局限性PC是在因泌尿系统症状接受经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)的患者中偶然发现的。已知TURP通常会影响前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平。在本研究中,我们研究了TURP后PSA水平的变化对局限性PC是否具有预测价值。我们回顾性分析了我院846例因诊断时出现泌尿系统症状而接受TURP的早期PC患者的临床资料。在846例患者中,687例TURP标本中有肿瘤累及,362例进行了TURP后PSA评估。我们的数据显示,除了诊断时GS和PSA水平较低外,TURP标本中肿瘤累及≤5%、TURP后PSA降低幅度更大(≥68%)以及TURP后PSA≤4与无进展生存期(PFS)更好显著相关。生存分析显示,添加前列腺导向局部治疗在中高危组中显著改善了PFS,但在低危组中未改善。此外,在中危组中,局部治疗仅对TURP后PSA>4 ng/mL或TURP后PSA降低<68%的患者改善了PFS。我们还发现,无论TURP前PSA如何,TURP后PSA≤4 ng/mL的患者局部治疗对PFS没有明显改善。总之,对于TURP后PSA降低幅度更大且TURP后PSA较低的低危或中危患者,考虑保守治疗。因此,TURP后的PSA水平可能有助于风险分层和选择保守治疗的患者。