Birk John, Bath Roopjeet Kaur
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul;9(7):883-5. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1041508. Epub 2015 May 15.
The use of propofol for sedation during endoscopy has been increasing, particularly given its association with superior patient satisfaction. Propofol sedation may also allow for higher quality endoscopy exams, increased efficiency of endoscopy suites and most particularly, permit better patient compliance with colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. However, propofol is typically provided by anesthesia specialists via monitored anesthesia care, and is associated with significant economic burden. Given the increasing use of monitored anesthesia care, which adds significant costs to endoscopy, payers are likely to react with changes in payer policies. One alternative to monitored anesthesia care is non-anesthesiologist administered propofol, which due to safety concerns and a lack of reimbursement has not been widely adopted in the US.
在内镜检查期间使用丙泊酚进行镇静的情况一直在增加,特别是考虑到它与更高的患者满意度相关。丙泊酚镇静还可能使内镜检查质量更高,提高内镜检查室的效率,最特别的是,能使患者在结肠镜检查中更好地配合进行结直肠癌筛查。然而,丙泊酚通常由麻醉专科医生通过麻醉监护来提供,并且会带来巨大的经济负担。鉴于麻醉监护的使用日益增加,这给内镜检查增加了大量成本,支付方可能会对支付政策做出调整。麻醉监护的一种替代方法是非麻醉医生给予丙泊酚,但由于安全问题和缺乏报销,在美国尚未得到广泛采用。