García Guerra A, Tribulo A, Yapura J, Adams G P, Singh J, Mapletoft R J
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Instituto de Reproducción Animal Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Theriogenology. 2015 Aug;84(3):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
A study was designed to compare the effects of a conventional (4 days) versus a lengthened (7 days) superstimulation protocol on follicle dynamics and to test the hypothesis that superstimulatory treatment only rescues small follicles within the wave. Nonlactating beef cows received a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device [PRID] and were superstimulated with 400-mg FSH on the day of follicle ablation-induced wave emergence (Day 0). The control group (n = 5) received FSH over 4 days, whereas the long group (n = 5) received FSH over 7 days. PGF was administered twice on Day 2 (control group) or 5 (long group), and PRIDs were removed 24 hours after the first PGF. Cows received 25-mg LH 24 hours after PRID removal. The cows chosen for the present study represented a subset from a larger group of 24 cows in which superovulation results were obtained and published. Cows in the present study were those with the lowest antral follicle counts at the time of wave emergence in order to facilitate tracking of individual follicles. Daily ultrasonographic examinations monitored follicle diameters and numbers. A reduction (P < 0.01) in the number of 1- to 2-mm follicles from Day 0 to the end of the superstimulatory treatment was associated with a progressive shift to the next size category in both groups. On the day of LH treatment, the number of follicles in any size category did not differ between groups. The number of follicles of diameter 5 mm or less decreased during superstimulation (i.e., no continuous recruitment of small follicles; P < 0.001), and the number of follicles of diameter 1 mm or greater at the end of superstimulation did not differ from that at the beginning of superstimulation (P = 0.739). However, the total number of follicles of diameter 3 mm or greater at the end was greater than the number of follicles of diameter 3 mm or greater at the beginning of superstimulation because of growth of the 1- to 2-mm population during treatment (P < 0.001). Follicle growth was slower in the long group than in the control group. Results support the hypothesis that both 4-day and 7-day superstimulatory protocols rescue small antral follicles present at the time of wave emergence; there was no evidence for continuous recruitment of new follicles. Results also provide rationale for the hypothesis that a lengthened treatment protocol is associated with greater follicle maturation and capacity to ovulate.
本研究旨在比较传统(4天)与延长(7天)超刺激方案对卵泡动态的影响,并检验超刺激治疗仅挽救波内小卵泡的假设。非泌乳期肉牛接受孕酮释放阴道内装置[PRID],并在卵泡消融诱导波出现当天(第0天)用400mg促卵泡素进行超刺激。对照组(n = 5)在4天内接受促卵泡素,而长疗程组(n = 5)在7天内接受促卵泡素。在第2天(对照组)或第5天(长疗程组)给予两次前列腺素F2α(PGF),并在首次给予PGF后24小时取出PRID。母牛在取出PRID后24小时接受25mg促黄体素(LH)。本研究选择的母牛是来自一组24头母牛中的一个子集,在该组中获得并发表了超数排卵结果。本研究中的母牛是在波出现时窦卵泡计数最低的母牛,以便于追踪单个卵泡。每天进行超声检查以监测卵泡直径和数量。从第0天到超刺激治疗结束,1至2毫米卵泡数量减少(P < 0.01),且两组均逐渐向更大尺寸类别转变。在LH治疗当天,各尺寸类别的卵泡数量在两组间无差异。超刺激期间直径5毫米及以下的卵泡数量减少(即无小卵泡持续募集;P < 0.001),超刺激结束时直径1毫米及以上的卵泡数量与超刺激开始时无差异(P = 0.739)。然而,由于治疗期间1至2毫米卵泡群体的生长,最终直径3毫米及以上的卵泡总数大于超刺激开始时直径3毫米及以上的卵泡数量(P < 0.001)。长疗程组的卵泡生长比对照组慢。结果支持了4天和7天超刺激方案均能挽救波出现时存在的小窦卵泡的假设;没有证据表明有新卵泡持续募集。结果也为延长治疗方案与更大的卵泡成熟度和排卵能力相关的假设提供了理论依据。