• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

死因裁判法庭调查中反对自证其罪的特权。

The privilege against self-incrimination in coroners' inquests.

作者信息

Freckelton Ian

出版信息

J Law Med. 2015 Mar;22(3):491-505.

PMID:25980183
Abstract

The privilege against self-incrimination has a venerable history in the conduct of coroners' inquests. However, recent statutory reforms to the privilege in coroners' courts, which have had disuniform outcomes throughout Australia, have complicated the circumstances in which the privilege is extended to those claiming its protection. This editorial reviews the evolving law on the privilege generally and rulings that have been made in high-profile coronial inquests, as well as the modest volume of appellate litigation on this important issue. It identifies that the emerging law on the area prioritises amongst relevant factors for the coroner's discretion to exercise coercive powers over witnesses' objections to give evidence the fact that they are charged with serious criminal offences, and that the need for and utility of the evidence are also functioning as important considerations.

摘要

反对自证其罪的特权在死因裁判官的讯问过程中有着悠久的历史。然而,最近对死因裁判法庭中该特权的法定改革在澳大利亚各地产生了不一致的结果,这使得将该特权扩展至寻求其保护的人的情形变得复杂。本社论总体回顾了关于该特权不断演变的法律以及在备受瞩目的死因裁判讯问中作出的裁决,还有关于这一重要问题的少量上诉诉讼。它指出,该领域新出现的法律在死因裁判官行使强制证人作证权力的自由裁量权的相关因素中,将证人被指控严重刑事犯罪这一事实置于优先地位,并且证据的必要性和实用性也是重要的考量因素。

相似文献

1
The privilege against self-incrimination in coroners' inquests.死因裁判法庭调查中反对自证其罪的特权。
J Law Med. 2015 Mar;22(3):491-505.
2
Natural justice and the coroner.自然正义与验尸官。
J Law Med. 2006 Nov;14(2):169-76.
3
Coroners' Inquests and Criminal and Disciplinary Law.死因裁判官审讯及刑事和纪律法。
J Law Med. 2023 Jul;30(2):259-277.
4
Cross examination of clinicians at coroners' inquests following deaths in custody.对羁押期间死亡事件进行死因裁判庭聆讯时对临床医生的交叉询问。
Int J Prison Health. 2012;8(3-4):92-8. doi: 10.1108/17449201211284969.
5
Procedural Fairness and the Coroner.程序公平与验尸官
J Law Med. 2018 Oct;26(1):7-22.
6
Legal aid for coroners' inquests.死因裁判官审讯的法律援助。
J Law Med. 2008 Feb;15(4):587-601.
7
The role of the district in the coronial process: the inquest 2.地区在死因裁判程序中的作用:死因调查2
Br J Community Nurs. 2008 Mar;13(3):138-41. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2008.13.3.28680.
8
Interstate and Overseas Deaths: Jurisdictional and Decision-Making Challenges for Coroners.州际和海外死亡:验尸官面临的管辖权和决策挑战
J Law Med. 2019 Apr;26(3):519-534.
9
"Blowed off by a side wind"? Coronial inquests following criminal acquittals.“被一阵侧风吹走了”?刑事无罪判决后的死因裁判庭调查。
J Law Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):595-608.
10
The Coroner's Role in the Prevention of Elder Abuse: A Study of Australian Coroner's Court Cases Involving Pressure Ulcers in Elders.验尸官在预防虐待老年人方面的作用:对澳大利亚验尸官法庭涉及老年人压疮案件的研究
J Law Med. 2018 Dec;26(2):494-509.