Li Wenhui, Jiang Zhongqing, Liu Ying, Dan Fei
College of Preschool and Primary Education, Shenyang Normal University, No. 253, HuangHe North Street, Shenyang, 110034, Liaoning, China.
School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, No. 850, HuangHe Road, Dalian, 116029, Liaoning, China.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Aug;45(4):769-78. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9376-0.
To explore how the sentence contexts affect self-positivity bias, we presented the participants with negation and affirmation sentences. Each sentence was ended with an adjective word describing human being's personality. The participants were asked to judge whether the sentences correctly described their own personalities. In affirmation sentences, the behavioral data showed that self-positivity bias occurred when participants considered the sentences to be in accordance with their personality; the ERP data showed that P200 amplitude was consistent with this behavioral result. In negation sentences, behavioral data showed self-positivity bias, regardless of whether the sentences were in accordance with participants' personality or not. However, the self-positivity bias was not observed in the ERP results from negation sentence. In summary, sentence type modulated the effect of self-positivity bias. The reason could be that processing affirmation and negation sentences requires different amount of cognitive resources.
为了探究句子语境如何影响自我积极偏差,我们向参与者呈现了否定句和肯定句。每个句子都以一个描述人类性格的形容词结尾。参与者被要求判断这些句子是否正确描述了他们自己的性格。在肯定句中,行为数据表明,当参与者认为句子与他们的性格相符时,会出现自我积极偏差;ERP数据表明,P200波幅与这一行为结果一致。在否定句中,行为数据显示出自我积极偏差,无论句子是否与参与者的性格相符。然而,在否定句的ERP结果中未观察到自我积极偏差。总之,句子类型调节了自我积极偏差的效应。原因可能是处理肯定句和否定句需要不同数量的认知资源。