Suppr超能文献

肝胰胆和结直肠手术患者输血触发因素的界定以及新鲜冰冻血浆和血小板的使用情况

Defining Transfusion Triggers and Utilization of Fresh Frozen Plasma and Platelets Among Patients Undergoing Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Colorectal Surgery.

作者信息

Ejaz Aslam, Frank Steven M, Spolverato Gaya, Kim Yuhree, Pawlik Timothy M

机构信息

*Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD †Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine (Interdisciplinary Blood Management Program), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):1079-85. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to define the overall utilization of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets and the impact on perioperative outcomes among patients undergoing hepatopancreaticobiliary and colorectal resections, as well as analyze the utility of laboratory triggers in guiding transfusion practice.

METHODS

We identified 3027 patients undergoing pancreatic, hepatic, and colorectal resections between 2010 and 2013 at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Data on international normalized ratio (INR) and platelet counts that triggered the perioperative utilization of these non-RBC (red blood cell) products were obtained and analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall FFP and platelet transfusion rates were 8.9% and 3.8%, respectively. Mean INR and platelet triggers for FFP and platelet transfusions were 1.9 ± 1.3 and 60000 ± 44000, respectively. INR triggers varied depending on resection type, patient race, and comorbidity status (all P <0.05). Nearly one-half of patients (48.0%) received FFP in the postoperative period with an INR trigger less than 1.7. FFP transfusions were independently associated with an increased length of stay [odds ratio (OR) = 3.66], perioperative morbidity (OR = 3.96) and in-hospital mortality (OR = 91.85) (all P < 0.001). Similarly, patients receiving platelets were at increased risk for worse overall perioperative outcomes (all OR >1, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization and indication of non-RBC components vary significantly across surgical specialties. Nearly one-half of patients transfused with FFP during the postoperative period had an INR of less than 1.7, indicating possible overutilization of these products. Furthermore, the use of FFP and platelets are associated with poorer perioperative outcomes. Further studies are needed to study the impact and management of a more restrictive use of FFP and platelets on surgical patients.

摘要

背景

我们试图确定新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)和血小板的总体使用情况,以及其对接受肝胰胆和结直肠手术患者围手术期结局的影响,并分析实验室指标在指导输血实践中的作用。

方法

我们确定了2010年至2013年间在约翰霍普金斯医院接受胰腺、肝脏和结直肠手术的3027例患者。获取并分析了触发围手术期使用这些非红细胞(RBC)制品的国际标准化比值(INR)和血小板计数数据。

结果

FFP和血小板的总体输血率分别为8.9%和3.8%。FFP和血小板输血的平均INR触发值和血小板触发值分别为1.9±1.3和60000±44000。INR触发值因手术类型、患者种族和合并症状态而异(所有P<0.05)。近一半的患者(48.0%)在术后因INR触发值小于1.7而接受了FFP。FFP输血与住院时间延长[比值比(OR)=3.66]、围手术期发病率(OR=3.96)和院内死亡率(OR=91.85)独立相关(所有P<0.001)。同样,接受血小板治疗的患者围手术期总体结局较差的风险增加(所有OR>1,P<0.001)。

结论

非红细胞成分的使用和指征在不同外科专业之间存在显著差异。近一半在术后接受FFP输血的患者INR小于1.7,表明这些制品可能存在过度使用的情况。此外,FFP和血小板的使用与较差的围手术期结局相关。需要进一步研究更严格使用FFP和血小板对手术患者的影响及管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验