von Eiff Wilfried
Adv Health Care Manag. 2015;17:223-52. doi: 10.1108/s1474-823120140000017014.
Hospitals worldwide are facing the same opportunities and threats: the demographics of an aging population; steady increases in chronic diseases and severe illnesses; and a steadily increasing demand for medical services with more intensive treatment for multi-morbid patients. Additionally, patients are becoming more demanding. They expect high quality medicine within a dignity-driven and painless healing environment. The severe financial pressures that these developments entail oblige care providers to more and more cost-containment and to apply process reengineering, as well as continuous performance improvement measures, so as to achieve future financial sustainability. At the same time, regulators are calling for improved patient outcomes. Benchmarking and best practice management are successfully proven performance improvement tools for enabling hospitals to achieve a higher level of clinical output quality, enhanced patient satisfaction, and care delivery capability, while simultaneously containing and reducing costs.
This chapter aims to clarify what benchmarking is and what it is not. Furthermore, it is stated that benchmarking is a powerful managerial tool for improving decision-making processes that can contribute to the above-mentioned improvement measures in health care delivery. The benchmarking approach described in this chapter is oriented toward the philosophy of an input-output model and is explained based on practical international examples from different industries in various countries.
Benchmarking is not a project with a defined start and end point, but a continuous initiative of comparing key performance indicators, process structures, and best practices from best-in-class companies inside and outside industry. Benchmarking is an ongoing process of measuring and searching for best-in-class performance: Measure yourself with yourself over time against key performance indicators. Measure yourself against others. Identify best practices. Equal or exceed this best practice in your institution. Focus on simple and effective ways to implement solutions. Comparing only figures, such as average length of stay, costs of procedures, infection rates, or out-of-stock rates, can lead easily to wrong conclusions and decision making with often-disastrous consequences. Just looking at figures and ratios is not the basis for detecting potential excellence. It is necessary to look beyond the numbers to understand how processes work and contribute to best-in-class results. Best practices from even quite different industries can enable hospitals to leapfrog results in patient orientation, clinical excellence, and cost-effectiveness.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Despite common benchmarking approaches, it is pointed out that a comparison without "looking behind the figures" (what it means to be familiar with the process structure, process dynamic and drivers, process institutions/rules and process-related incentive components) will be extremely limited referring to reliability and quality of findings. In order to demonstrate transferability of benchmarking results between different industries practical examples from health care, automotive, and hotel service have been selected. Additionally, it is depicted that international comparisons between hospitals providing medical services in different health care systems do have a great potential for achieving leapfrog results in medical quality, organization of service provision, effective work structures, purchasing and logistics processes, or management, etc.
全球医院面临着相同的机遇与挑战:人口老龄化;慢性病和重症稳步增加;对医疗服务的需求不断上升,对患有多种疾病的患者需要更强化的治疗。此外,患者的要求也越来越高。他们期望在尊严至上且无痛的康复环境中接受高质量医疗。这些发展带来的巨大财务压力迫使医疗服务提供者越来越多地进行成本控制,实施流程再造以及持续改进绩效的措施,以实现未来的财务可持续性。与此同时,监管机构要求改善患者治疗效果。标杆管理和最佳实践管理是经成功验证的绩效改进工具,能使医院在提高临床产出质量、提升患者满意度和护理服务能力的同时,控制并降低成本。
本章旨在阐明什么是标杆管理以及不是什么。此外,指出标杆管理是一种强大的管理工具,可改善决策过程,有助于上述医疗服务提供方面的改进措施。本章所描述的标杆管理方法以投入产出模型理念为导向,并基于来自不同国家不同行业的实际国际案例进行解释。
标杆管理不是一个有明确起点和终点的项目,而是一个持续不断地比较行业内外一流公司的关键绩效指标、流程结构和最佳实践的举措。标杆管理是一个持续衡量并寻求一流绩效的过程:随着时间推移,对照关键绩效指标自我衡量。与他人进行对比。识别最佳实践。在你的机构中等同或超越此最佳实践。专注于以简单有效的方式实施解决方案。仅比较诸如平均住院时间、手术成本、感染率或缺货率等数字,很容易导致错误结论和决策,往往会带来灾难性后果。仅仅查看数字和比率并非发现潜在卓越之处的基础。有必要透过数字去了解流程如何运作以及如何促成一流成果。即使是来自截然不同行业的最佳实践,也能使医院在以患者为中心、临床卓越和成本效益方面实现跨越式发展。
原创性/价值:尽管有常见的标杆管理方法,但需指出,若不“透过数字看背后情况”(即熟悉流程结构、流程动态和驱动因素、流程制度/规则以及与流程相关的激励因素)进行比较,那么在结果的可靠性和质量方面会极为有限。为展示标杆管理结果在不同行业间的可转移性,选取了医疗保健、汽车和酒店服务行业的实际案例。此外,还表明在不同医疗保健系统中提供医疗服务的医院之间进行国际比较,在医疗质量、服务提供组织、高效工作结构、采购和物流流程或管理等方面极有可能实现跨越式发展。