University of Colorado Boulder
University of Colorado Boulder.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 May;10(3):390-9. doi: 10.1177/1745691614564879.
In a direct replication, the typical goal is to reproduce a prior experimental result with a new but comparable sample of participants in a high-powered replication study. Often in psychology, the research to be replicated involves a sample of participants responding to a sample of stimuli. In replicating such studies, we argue that the same criteria should be used in sampling stimuli as are used in sampling participants. Namely, a new but comparable sample of stimuli should be used to ensure that the original results are not due to idiosyncrasies of the original stimulus sample, and the stimulus sample must often be enlarged to ensure high statistical power. In support of the latter point, we discuss the fact that in experiments involving samples of stimuli, statistical power typically does not approach 1 as the number of participants goes to infinity. As an example of the importance of sampling new stimuli, we discuss the bygone literature on the risky shift phenomenon, which was almost entirely based on a single stimulus sample that was later discovered to be highly unrepresentative. We discuss the use of both resampled and expanded stimulus sets, that is, stimulus samples that include the original stimuli plus new stimuli.
在直接复制中,典型的目标是用新的但可比的参与者样本在高功效的复制研究中重现先前的实验结果。在心理学中,通常需要复制的研究涉及参与者对样本刺激的反应。在复制此类研究时,我们认为在抽样刺激时应该使用与抽样参与者相同的标准。也就是说,应该使用新的但可比的刺激样本,以确保原始结果不是由于原始刺激样本的特殊性所致,并且通常必须扩大刺激样本以确保高统计功效。为了支持后一点,我们讨论了这样一个事实,即在涉及刺激样本的实验中,随着参与者数量的增加,统计功效通常不会接近 1。作为抽样新刺激的重要性的一个例子,我们讨论了有风险的转移现象的过去文献,该文献几乎完全基于后来发现极不具有代表性的单个刺激样本。我们讨论了使用重新采样和扩展的刺激集,即包括原始刺激加新刺激的刺激样本。