Cates Jordan E, Mitrani-Gold Fanny S, Li Gang, Mundy Linda M
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Aug;59(8):4510-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00679-15. Epub 2015 May 18.
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the antibacterial treatment effect for linezolid and ceftaroline to inform on the design of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) noninferiority trials. The primary endpoints included an early clinical treatment response (ECTR) defined as cessation of lesion spread at 48 to 72 h postrandomization and the test-of-cure (TOC) response defined as total resolution of the infection at 7 to 14 days posttreatment. The systematic review identified no placebo-controlled trials in ABSSSI, 4 placebo-controlled trials in uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infection as a proxy for placebo in ABSSSI, 12 linezolid trials in ABSSSI, 3 ceftaroline trials in ABSSSI, and 2 trials for nonantibacterial treatment. The ECTR rates at 48 to 72 h and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 78.7% (95% CI, 61.1 to 96.3%) for linezolid, 74.0% (95% CI, 69.7 to 78.3%) for ceftaroline, and 59.0% (95% CI, 52.8 to 65.3%) for nonantibacterial treatment. The early clinical treatment effect could not be estimated, given no available placebo or proxy for placebo data for this endpoint. Clinical, methodological, and statistical heterogeneity influenced the selection of trials for the meta-analysis of the TOC treatment effect estimation. The pooled estimates of the TOC treatment response were 31.0% (95% CI, 6.2 to 55.9%) for the proxy for placebo, 88.1% (95% CI, 81.0 to 95.1%) for linezolid, and 86.1% (95% CI, 83.7 to 88.6%) for ceftaroline. The TOC clinical treatment effect estimation was 25.1% for linezolid and 27.8% for ceftaroline. The antibacterial treatment effect estimation at TOC will inform on the design and analysis of future noninferiority ABSSSI clinical trials.
进行了一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析,以评估利奈唑胺和头孢洛林的抗菌治疗效果,为急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)非劣效性试验的设计提供依据。主要终点包括早期临床治疗反应(ECTR),定义为随机分组后48至72小时病变停止扩散,以及治疗结束时反应(TOC),定义为治疗后7至14天感染完全消退。该系统综述未发现ABSSSI的安慰剂对照试验,发现4项单纯皮肤和软组织感染的安慰剂对照试验可作为ABSSSI中安慰剂的替代,12项ABSSSI的利奈唑胺试验,3项ABSSSI的头孢洛林试验,以及2项非抗菌治疗试验。利奈唑胺在48至72小时的ECTR率及相应的95%置信区间(CI)为78.7%(95%CI,61.1%至96.3%),头孢洛林为74.0%(95%CI,69.7%至78.3%),非抗菌治疗为59.0%(95%CI,52.8%至65.3%)。鉴于该终点没有可用的安慰剂或安慰剂替代数据,无法估计早期临床治疗效果。临床、方法学和统计学异质性影响了用于TOC治疗效果估计荟萃分析的试验选择。TOC治疗反应的汇总估计值,安慰剂替代为31.0%(95%CI,6.2%至55.9%),利奈唑胺为88.1%(95%CI,81.0%至95.1%),头孢洛林为86.1%(95%CI,83.7%至88.6%)。利奈唑胺的TOC临床治疗效果估计为25.1%,头孢洛林为27.8%。TOC时的抗菌治疗效果估计将为未来ABSSSI非劣效性临床试验的设计和分析提供依据。