Ramiro Sofia, Landewé Robert B M, van der Heijde Désirée, Stolwijk Carmen, Dougados Maxime, van den Bosch Filip, van Tubergen Astrid
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, and Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Nov;67(11):1571-7. doi: 10.1002/acr.22614.
To investigate which spinal mobility measures (SMMs) are most frequently impaired in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), whether a hierarchy of impairment can be established, and whether assessing fewer measures sufficiently captures impairment in spinal mobility.
Patients from the Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study were followed up for 12 years. SMMs were considered impaired when falling below predefined cutoffs, derived from normal individuals. The proportion of patients in whom each SMM was impaired was calculated using baseline observation. In patients with ≥1 impaired SMM, we investigated how often impairment in spinal mobility would be missed if only a fixed number of SMMs was assessed. Analyses were repeated using all 12-year observations.
A total of 216 patients were included (70% males). Lateral spinal flexion (LSF) was the most frequently impaired measure, followed by the modified Schober (mSchober) test, tragus-to-wall, cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, and chest expansion measures, respectively. This hierarchy was strikingly consistent over time, and independent of sex, symptom duration, and presence of syndesmophytes. In patients with ≥1 impaired SMM, LSF was impaired most frequently (86%), followed by the mSchober test (58%). If only LSF was measured, 14% of patients with impairment in any SMM would be missed; if additionally the mSchober test was measured, 9% would be missed.
LSF followed by the mSchober test are the most frequently impaired mobility measures in AS, reflecting an earlier involvement of the lumbar spine, followed by involvement of the thoracic and cervical spine. In clinical practice LSF and the mSchober test suffice to screen impairment in spinal mobility.
研究强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者中哪些脊柱活动度测量指标(SMMs)最常受损,是否可以建立损伤等级体系,以及评估较少的指标是否足以充分反映脊柱活动度损伤情况。
对参加国际强直性脊柱炎转归研究的患者进行了12年的随访。当SMMs低于从正常个体得出的预先定义的临界值时,认为其受损。使用基线观察数据计算每个SMM受损的患者比例。在至少有一项SMM受损的患者中,我们研究了如果仅评估固定数量的SMM,脊柱活动度损伤被漏诊的频率。使用全部12年的观察数据重复进行分析。
共纳入216例患者(70%为男性)。脊柱侧屈(LSF)是最常受损的指标,其次分别是改良Schober试验、耳屏至墙距离、颈椎旋转、内踝间距离和胸廓扩展测量指标。这一等级体系随时间推移显著一致,且与性别、症状持续时间和骨桥形成的存在无关。在至少有一项SMM受损的患者中,LSF最常受损(86%),其次是改良Schober试验(58%)。如果仅测量LSF,任何SMM受损的患者中有14%会被漏诊;如果另外测量改良Schober试验,漏诊率为9%。
AS中最常受损的活动度测量指标是LSF,其次是改良Schober试验,这反映出腰椎更早受累,随后是胸椎和颈椎受累。在临床实践中,LSF和改良Schober试验足以筛查脊柱活动度损伤情况。