de Witte Moniek A, Kierkels Guido J J, Straetemans Trudy, Britten Cedrik M, Kuball Jürgen
Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room Number Q05.4.301, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015 Jul;64(7):893-902. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1710-8. Epub 2015 May 20.
Over half a century ago, the first allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) initiated cellular immunotherapy. For several decades, little progress was made, and toxicity of allo-SCT remained a major challenge. However, recent breakthroughs have opened new avenues to further develop this modality and to provide less toxic and equally efficient interventions for patients suffering from hematological or solid malignancies. Current novel cellular immune interventions include ex vivo expansion and adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating immune cells or administration of drugs which antagonize tolerizing mechanisms. Alternatively, transfer of immune cells engineered to express defined T cell receptors (TCRs) and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has shown its potential. A valuable addition to 'engineered' adaptive immunity has emerged recently through the improved understanding of how innate immune cells can attack cancer cells without substantial side effects. This has enabled the development of transplantation platforms with limited side effects allowing early immune interventions as well as the design of engineered immune cells expressing innate immune receptors. Here, we focus on innate immune interventions and their orchestration with TCR- and CAR-engineered immune cells. In addition, we discuss how the exploitation of the full potential of cellular immune interventions is influenced by regulatory frameworks. Finally, we highlight and discuss substantial differences in the current landscape of clinical trials in Europe as compared to the USA. The aim is to stimulate international efforts to support regulatory authorities and funding agencies, especially in Europe, to create an environment that will endorse the development of engineered immune cells for the benefit of patients.
半个多世纪前,首例异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)开启了细胞免疫治疗的先河。几十年来,进展甚微,allo-SCT的毒性仍是一项重大挑战。然而,最近的突破为进一步发展这种治疗方式开辟了新途径,并为患有血液系统恶性肿瘤或实体恶性肿瘤的患者提供毒性更小且同样有效的干预措施。当前新型细胞免疫干预措施包括体外扩增和过继转移肿瘤浸润免疫细胞或给予拮抗耐受机制的药物。此外,转输经工程改造以表达特定T细胞受体(TCR)和嵌合抗原受体(CAR)的免疫细胞已显示出其潜力。最近,随着对固有免疫细胞如何在无明显副作用的情况下攻击癌细胞的认识不断加深,为“工程化”适应性免疫增添了一项有价值的内容。这使得能够开发副作用有限的移植平台,从而实现早期免疫干预,并设计出表达固有免疫受体的工程化免疫细胞。在此,我们重点关注固有免疫干预及其与经TCR和CAR工程改造的免疫细胞的协同作用。此外,我们还讨论了细胞免疫干预的全部潜力的开发是如何受到监管框架影响的。最后,我们强调并讨论了欧洲与美国目前临床试验格局中的重大差异。目的是激发国际社会做出努力,以支持监管机构和资助机构,尤其是在欧洲,营造一个将认可工程化免疫细胞的开发以造福患者的环境。