Suppr超能文献

哮喘儿童的呼吸肌力量

Respiratory muscle strength in asthmatic children.

作者信息

Marcelino Alessandra Maria Farias Cavalcante, da Cunha Daniele Andrade, da Cunha Renata Andrade, da Silva Hilton Justino

机构信息

Master. Professor.

PhD. Professor.

出版信息

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;16(4):492-6. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772012000400010.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Changes in the respiratory system of asthmatics are also due to the mechanical disadvantage caused by the increased airway resistance.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to evaluate the respiratory muscle strength and nutritional status of asthmatic children.

METHOD

This is a prospective descriptive and transversal study with 50 children aged 7 to 12 years, who were placed into 2 groups, asthmatic and non-asthmatic. Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated on the basis of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP). The nutritional status was evaluated by measuring the anthropometric data, including height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). The findings were subjected to analysis of variance, chi-square, and Student's t test, and p-values < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In our comparisons, we observed statistically significantly lower values for age, weight, and height in asthmatic patients: 8.52 ± 1.49 years, 30.62 ± 7.66 kg, and 129.85 ± 10.24 cm, respectively, vs. non-asthmatic children(9.79 ± 1.51 years, 39.92 ± 16.57 kg, and 139.04 ± 11.62 cm, respectively). There was no significant increase in MIP and MEP between the groups: MIP was -84.96 ± 27.52 cmH2O for the asthmatic group and -88.56 ± 26.50 cmH2O for the non-asthmatic group, and MEP was 64.48 ± 19.23 cmH2O for asthmatic children and +66.72 ± 16.56 cmH2O for non-asthmatics.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant difference between groups, but we observed that MIP and MEP were slightly higher in the non-asthmatic group than in the asthmatic group.

摘要

引言

哮喘患者呼吸系统的变化也归因于气道阻力增加所导致的机械劣势。

目的

本研究旨在评估哮喘儿童的呼吸肌力量和营养状况。

方法

这是一项前瞻性描述性横断面研究,纳入了50名7至12岁的儿童,分为哮喘组和非哮喘组。基于最大吸气压(MIP)和最大呼气压(MEP)评估呼吸肌力量。通过测量人体测量数据(包括身高、体重和体重指数(BMI))评估营养状况。研究结果进行方差分析、卡方检验和学生t检验,p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在我们的比较中,我们观察到哮喘患者的年龄、体重和身高在统计学上显著较低:分别为8.52±1.49岁、30.62±7.66千克和129.85±10.24厘米,而非哮喘儿童分别为(9.79±1.51岁、39.92±16.57千克和139.04±11.

相似文献

1
Respiratory muscle strength in asthmatic children.哮喘儿童的呼吸肌力量
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;16(4):492-6. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772012000400010.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of physical fitness in children with asthma.哮喘患儿体能的决定因素
Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 1):e225-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.3.e225.
2
Disorders of the respiratory muscles.呼吸肌疾病。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul 1;168(1):10-48. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2206020.
3
ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing.美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会关于呼吸肌测试的声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug 15;166(4):518-624. doi: 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518.
6
Chest wall hyperinflation during acute bronchoconstriction in asthma.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;160(3):808-16. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.3.9712088.
8
Human lung growth: a review.人类肺部发育:综述
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996 Jun;21(6):383-97. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199606)21:6<383::AID-PPUL6>3.0.CO;2-M.
9
Measuring quality of life in children with asthma.测量哮喘儿童的生活质量。
Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/BF00435967.
10
Corticosteroids contribute to muscle weakness in chronic airflow obstruction.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Jul;150(1):11-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.1.8025735.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验