• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋肯定性咨询自我效能量表简版(LGB-CSI-SF)的编制。

Development of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Affirmative Counseling Self-Efficacy Inventory - Short Form (LGB-CSI-SF).

作者信息

Dillon Frank R, Alessi Edward J, Craig Shelley, Eber-Sole Ryan C, Kumar Snehal M, Spadola Christine

机构信息

Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York.

School of Social Work, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey.

出版信息

Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2015 Mar;2(1):86-95. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000087.

DOI:10.1037/sgd0000087
PMID:25992391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4433756/
Abstract

The Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Affirmative Counseling Self-Efficacy Inventory - Short Form (LGB-CSI-SF) was developed to facilitate LGB-affirmative counseling training, as well as process and outcome research, by offering a brief psychometrically supported version of the original LGB-CSI measure to researchers and clinicians. Five hundred seventy-five participants (435 licensed mental health professionals and 140 graduate students/trainees) constituted the sample. Confirmatory factor analyses of the 32 items from the original LGB-CSI yielded a new 15-item version of the measure composed of 5 factors (consisting of 3 items each) that assess counselor self-efficacy to perform lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) affirmative counseling behaviors (Application of Knowledge, Advocacy Skills, Self-Awareness, Relationship, and Assessment). The LGB-CSI-SF evidenced high internal consistency and adequate test-retest stability. Convergent validity was supported by correlations between LGB-CSI-SF total scores and Application of Knowledge, Advocacy Skills, Relationship, and Assessment subscales and instruction in LGB issues, as well as personal/professional relations with LGB individuals. More affirmative attitudes toward LGB persons positively related with total scores and Advocacy Skills, Self-Awareness, and Relationship subscales. Discriminant validity was evidenced by an absence of relations between LGB-CSI-SF subscales and a measure of impression management. We found no associations between Advocacy Skills, Assessment, and Relationship subscales and a measure of Self-Deception. Recommendations for implementing the LGB-CSI-SF in future LGB-affirmative counseling self-efficacy based research and training interventions are discussed.

摘要

女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋肯定性咨询自我效能感量表简版(LGB-CSI-SF)的开发,旨在通过为研究人员和临床医生提供一个经过心理测量学支持的原始LGB-CSI量表的简短版本,来促进女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋肯定性咨询培训以及过程和结果研究。575名参与者(435名持牌心理健康专业人员和140名研究生/受训人员)构成了样本。对原始LGB-CSI的32个项目进行的验证性因素分析产生了一个新的15个项目的量表版本,由5个因素(每个因素由3个项目组成)组成,这些因素评估咨询师进行女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋(LGB)肯定性咨询行为的自我效能感(知识应用、倡导技能、自我意识、关系和评估)。LGB-CSI-SF表现出高内部一致性和足够的重测稳定性。LGB-CSI-SF总分与知识应用、倡导技能、关系和评估子量表以及LGB问题的指导以及与LGB个体的个人/职业关系之间的相关性支持了收敛效度。对LGB人群更肯定的态度与总分以及倡导技能、自我意识和关系子量表呈正相关。LGB-CSI-SF子量表与印象管理测量之间不存在关系,证明了区分效度。我们发现倡导技能、评估和关系子量表与自我欺骗测量之间没有关联。讨论了在未来基于LGB肯定性咨询自我效能感的研究和培训干预中实施LGB-CSI-SF的建议。

相似文献

1
Development of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Affirmative Counseling Self-Efficacy Inventory - Short Form (LGB-CSI-SF).女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋肯定性咨询自我效能量表简版(LGB-CSI-SF)的编制。
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2015 Mar;2(1):86-95. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000087.
2
Assessing lesbian, gay, and bisexual affirmative training in couple and family therapy: establishing the validity of the Faculty Version of the Affirmative Training Inventory.评估夫妻与家庭治疗中针对女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋者的肯定性培训:确立肯定性培训量表教师版的效度。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2015 Jan;41(1):57-69; quiz 69-71. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12054. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
3
The effects of lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences and internal beliefs on lesbian, gay, and bisexual affirmative counselor competence among Chinese counselors.性少数群体经历和内部信念对中国咨询师开展性少数群体肯定性咨询胜任力的影响。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2021 Mar;58(1):25-36. doi: 10.1037/pst0000346. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
4
Therapist correlates of attitudes toward sexual minority individuals, affirmative counseling self-efficacy, and beliefs about affirmative practice.治疗师对性少数个体的态度、肯定性咨询自我效能感以及对肯定性实践的信念之间的相关性。
Psychother Res. 2016 Jul;26(4):446-58. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1026422. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
5
The State of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Affirmative Training: A Survey of Faculty from Accredited Couple and Family Therapy Programs.女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋肯定性培训状况:对来自经认可的夫妻与家庭治疗项目的教员的一项调查。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2016 Jan;42(1):153-67. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12106. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
6
Practitioner training for counseling lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients.针对女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋客户进行咨询的从业者培训。
J Lesbian Stud. 2002 Oct;6(3-4):111-20. doi: 10.1300/J155v06n03_10.
7
Affirmative Competence and Practices of Mental Health Professionals with LGB clients: An Ibero-American Study.心理健康专业人员与 LGB 客户的肯定能力和实践:一项伊比利亚-美洲研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Jul;55(5):884-893. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00373-0. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Perceived Attitudes Toward Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) Issues and Mental Health Among Taiwanese LGB Adults: The Mediating Role of Self-Acceptance.台湾地区 LGBT 成人对同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(LGB)问题和心理健康的感知态度:自我接纳的中介作用。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Jul;49(5):1671-1682. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01686-y. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
9
Does affirmative training matter? Assessing CFT students' beliefs about sexual orientation and their level of affirmative training.肯定性训练是否重要?评估 CFT 学生对性取向的信念及其肯定性训练水平。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2010 Apr;36(2):171-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00172.x.
10
A Comprehensive Psychometric Examination of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Knowledge and Attitudes Scale for Heterosexuals (LGB-KASH).针对异性恋者的女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋知识与态度量表(LGB-KASH)的全面心理测量学检验。
J Homosex. 2019;66(8):1104-1125. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1491705. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of lesbian and gay affirmative practice among heterosexual therapists.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2015 Sep;52(3):298-307. doi: 10.1037/a0038580. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
2
Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology.咨询心理学中缺失数据管理的最佳实践。
J Couns Psychol. 2010 Jan;57(1):1-10. doi: 10.1037/a0018082.
3
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
4
Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions.结构方程建模:优势、局限性及误解
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:31-65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239.
5
Respondent burden in clinical research: when are we asking too much of subjects?临床研究中的受试者负担:我们何时对受试者要求过多?
IRB. 2005 Jul-Aug;27(4):17-20.