Meadley Ben, Heschl Stefan, Andrew Emily, de Wit Anthony, Bernard Stephen A, Smith Karen
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):106-10. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1037479. Epub 2015 May 20.
Winching emergency medical care providers from a helicopter to the scene enables treatment of patients in otherwise inaccessible locations, but is not without risks. The objective of this study was to define characteristics of winch missions undertaken by Intensive Care Flight Paramedics (ICFP) in Victoria, Australia with a focus on extraction methods and clinical care delivered at the scene. A retrospective data analysis was performed to identify all winch missions between November 2010 and March 2014. Demographic data, winch characteristics, physiological parameters, and interventions undertaken on scene by the ICFP were extracted. Out of 5,003 missions in the study period, 125 were identified as winch operations. Winter missions were significantly less frequent than those of any other season. Patients were predominantly male (78.4%) and had a mean age of 38 years (±17.6). A total of 109 (87.2%) patients were identified as experiencing trauma with a mean Revised Trauma Score of 7.5288, and isolated limb fractures were the most frequently encountered injury. Falls and vehicle-related trauma were the most common mechanisms of injury. The total median scene duration was 49 minutes (IQR 23-91). Sixty-three patients (50.4%) were extracted using a stretcher, 45 (36.0%) using a hypothermic strop, and 6 (4.8%) via normal rescue strop. Eleven patients (8.8%) were not winched to the helicopter. Vascular access (38.4%), analgesia (44.0%), and anti-emetic administration (28.8%) were the most frequent clinical interventions. Forty-nine patients (39.2%) did not receive any clinical intervention prior to winch extraction. Winch operations in Victoria, Australia consisted predominantly of patients with minor to moderate traumatic injuries. A significant proportion of patients did not require any clinical treatment prior to winching, and among those who did, analgesia was the most frequent intervention. Advanced medical procedures were rarely required prior to winch extraction.
将急救医疗人员从直升机吊运至现场,能够对原本难以抵达的地点的患者进行治疗,但并非毫无风险。本研究的目的是确定澳大利亚维多利亚州重症监护飞行护理人员(ICFP)执行的吊运任务的特点,重点是吊运方法和现场提供的临床护理。进行了一项回顾性数据分析,以确定2010年11月至2014年3月期间的所有吊运任务。提取了人口统计学数据、吊运特点、生理参数以及ICFP在现场进行的干预措施。在研究期间的5003次任务中,有125次被确定为吊运行动。冬季任务的频率明显低于其他任何季节。患者以男性为主(78.4%),平均年龄为38岁(±17.6)。共有109名(87.2%)患者被确定为遭受创伤,平均修订创伤评分7.5288,孤立肢体骨折是最常遇到的损伤。跌倒和与车辆相关的创伤是最常见的受伤机制。现场总中位持续时间为49分钟(四分位间距23 - 91)。63名患者(50.4%)通过担架吊运,45名(36.0%)使用低温吊带,6名(4.8%)通过常规救援吊带吊运。11名患者(8.8%)未被吊运至直升机。血管通路建立(38.4%)、镇痛(44.0%)和止吐药给药(28.8%)是最常见的临床干预措施。49名患者(39.2%)在吊运提取前未接受任何临床干预。澳大利亚维多利亚州的吊运行动主要涉及轻度至中度创伤性损伤的患者。相当一部分患者在吊运前不需要任何临床治疗,而在需要治疗的患者中,镇痛是最常见的干预措施。吊运提取前很少需要高级医疗程序。