Page Ray D, Newcomer Lee N, Sprandio John D, McAneny Barbara L
From The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Fort Worth, TX; UnitedHealthcare, Minnetonka, MN; Consultants in Medical Oncology and Hematology, Drexel Hill, PA; New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015:e82-9. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e82.
In recent years, the cost of providing quality cancer care has been subject to an epic escalation causing concerns on the verge of a health care crisis. Innovative patient-management models in oncology based on patient-centered medical home (PCMH) principles, coupled with alternative payments to traditional fee for service (FFS), such as bundled and episodes payment are now showing evidence of effectiveness. These efforts have the potential to bend the cost curve while also improving quality of care and patient satisfaction. However, going forward with FFS alternatives, there are several performance-based payment options with an array of financial risks and rewards. Most novel payment options convey a greater financial risk and accountability on the provider. Therefore, the oncology medical home (OMH) can be a way to mitigate some financial risks by sharing savings with the payer through better global care of the patient, proactively preventing complications, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations. However, much of the medical home infrastructure that is required to reduced total costs of cancer care comes as an added expense to the provider. As best-of-practice quality standards are being elucidated and refined, we are now at a juncture where payers, providers, policymakers, and other stakeholders should work in concert to expand and implement the OMH framework into the variety of oncology practice environments to better equip them to assimilate into the new payment reform configurations of the future.
近年来,提供优质癌症护理的成本急剧上升,引发了对医疗保健危机的担忧。基于以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)原则的肿瘤学创新患者管理模式,再加上对传统按服务收费(FFS)的替代支付方式,如捆绑支付和按诊疗事件付费,现在已显示出有效性证据。这些努力有可能使成本曲线趋于平缓,同时提高护理质量和患者满意度。然而,在推进FFS替代方案时,有几种基于绩效的支付选项,伴随着一系列财务风险和回报。大多数新颖的支付选项给提供者带来了更大的财务风险和责任。因此,肿瘤医疗之家(OMH)可以通过更好地全面护理患者、积极预防并发症、急诊就诊和住院,与支付方分享节省费用,从而减轻一些财务风险。然而,降低癌症护理总成本所需的许多医疗之家基础设施对提供者来说是一笔额外费用。随着最佳实践质量标准的阐明和完善,我们现在正处于一个关键时刻,支付方、提供者、政策制定者和其他利益相关者应协同努力,将OMH框架扩展并实施到各种肿瘤学实践环境中,以使它们更好地适应未来新的支付改革模式。