Suppr超能文献

在中国,结核病治疗真的免费吗?一项比较两种不同管理模式地区的研究。

Is tuberculosis treatment really free in China? A study comparing two areas with different management models.

作者信息

Qiu Sangsang, Pan Hongqiu, Zhang Simin, Peng Xianzhen, Zheng Xianzhi, Xu Guisheng, Wang Min, Wang Jianming, Lu Hui

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Tuberculosis, Third Hospital of Zhenjiang City, Zhenjiang, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 May 20;10(5):e0126770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126770. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

China has implemented a free-service policy for tuberculosis. However, patients still have to pay a substantial proportion of their annual income for treatment of this disease. This study describes the economic burden on patients with tuberculosis; identifies related factors by comparing two areas with different management models; and provides policy recommendation for tuberculosis control reform in China.

METHODS

There are three tuberculosis management models in China: the tuberculosis dispensary model, specialist model and integrated model. We selected Zhangjiagang (ZJG) and Taixing (TX) as the study sites, which correspond to areas implementing the integrated model and dispensary model, respectively. Patients diagnosed and treated for tuberculosis since January 2010 were recruited as study subjects. A total of 590 patients (316 patients from ZJG and 274 patients from TX) were interviewed with a response rate of 81%. The economic burden attributed to tuberculosis, including direct costs and indirect costs, was estimated and compared between the two study sites. The Mann-Whitney U Test was used to compare the cost differences between the two groups. Potential factors related to the total out-of-pocket costs were analyzed based on a step-by-step multivariate linear regression model after the logarithmic transformation of the costs.

RESULTS

The average (median, interquartile range) total cost was 18793.33 (9965, 3200-24400) CNY for patients in ZJG, which was significantly higher than for patients in TX (mean: 6598.33, median: 2263, interquartile range: 983-6688) (Z = 10.42, P < 0.001). After excluding expenses covered by health insurance, the average out-of-pocket costs were 14304.4 CNY in ZJG and 5639.2 CNY in TX. Based on the multivariable linear regression analysis, factors related to the total out-of-pocket costs were study site, age, number of clinical visits, residence, diagnosis delay, hospitalization, intake of liver protective drugs and use of the second-line drugs.

CONCLUSION

Under the current "free of diagnosis and treatment" policy, the financial burden remains heavy on tuberculosis patients. Policy makers need to consider appropriate steps to lessen the burden of out-of-pocket costs for tuberculosis patients in China and how best to improve service delivery for poor patients.

摘要

目的

中国已实施结核病免费服务政策。然而,患者仍需支付其年收入的很大一部分用于治疗该疾病。本研究描述了结核病患者的经济负担;通过比较两种不同管理模式的地区来确定相关因素;并为中国结核病控制改革提供政策建议。

方法

中国有三种结核病管理模式:结核病防治所模式、专科模式和综合模式。我们选择张家港(ZJG)和泰兴(TX)作为研究地点,分别对应实施综合模式和防治所模式的地区。招募自2010年1月起被诊断并接受结核病治疗的患者作为研究对象。共采访了590名患者(316名来自ZJG,274名来自TX),应答率为81%。估计并比较了两个研究地点因结核病产生的经济负担,包括直接成本和间接成本。采用曼-惠特尼U检验比较两组之间的成本差异。在对成本进行对数变换后,基于逐步多元线性回归模型分析与自付费用总额相关的潜在因素。

结果

ZJG患者的平均(中位数,四分位间距)总成本为18793.33元(9965元,3200 - 24400元),显著高于TX患者(均值:6598.33元,中位数:2263元,四分位间距:983 - 6688元)(Z = 10.42,P < 0.001)。扣除医疗保险覆盖费用后,ZJG的平均自付费用为14304.4元,TX为5639.2元。基于多变量线性回归分析,与自付费用总额相关的因素有研究地点、年龄、临床就诊次数、居住地、诊断延迟、住院治疗、服用保肝药物和使用二线药物。

结论

在当前“诊疗免费”政策下,结核病患者的经济负担仍然沉重。政策制定者需要考虑采取适当措施减轻中国结核病患者的自付费用负担,以及如何最好地改善为贫困患者提供的服务。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Governance of tuberculosis control programme in Nigeria.尼日利亚结核病控制规划的治理。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2019 Jun 17;8(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40249-019-0556-2.

本文引用的文献

2

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验