Kasselimis Dimitrios, Chatziantoniou Lina, Peppas Christos, Evdokimidis Ioannis, Potagas Constantin
Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece,
Neurol Sci. 2015 Sep;36(9):1687-90. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2258-2. Epub 2015 May 21.
A lesion in inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is traditionally considered to be crucial for the occurrence of non-fluent aphasia. However, recent studies question the axiomatic causality between a lesion in this area and the expected non-fluent aphasic syndrome. The aim of the present study is to investigate the relationship between IFG lesions and non-fluent aphasia. To address this question, we present radiological and neuropsychological data of 49 chronic aphasic patients. Lesions were identified based on CT and/or MRI scans. Aphasia was assessed using the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination-short form. Analysis indicated a statistically significant association between IFG lesion and non-fluent aphasic disturbances. Nevertheless, a large proportion of our patients did not confirm the traditional prediction, namely that non-fluent patients' lesions would include the inferior frontal gyrus and the opposite would be true for fluent patients. Our results stress the importance of taking into account the size of particular estimates when conducting group analyses. We also argue in favor of examining individual data in clinical practice, and further suggest that the traditional lesion to syndrome correspondence seems to be oversimplified and should be thoroughly revisited.
传统上认为,额下回(IFG)的损伤对于非流利性失语的发生至关重要。然而,最近的研究对该区域损伤与预期的非流利性失语综合征之间的公理因果关系提出了质疑。本研究的目的是调查额下回损伤与非流利性失语之间的关系。为了解决这个问题,我们展示了49例慢性失语症患者的放射学和神经心理学数据。根据CT和/或MRI扫描确定损伤情况。使用波士顿诊断失语症检查简表评估失语症。分析表明,额下回损伤与非流利性失语障碍之间存在统计学上的显著关联。然而,我们的大部分患者并未证实传统预测,即非流利性患者的损伤将包括额下回,而流利性患者则相反。我们的结果强调了在进行组分析时考虑特定估计值大小的重要性。我们还主张在临床实践中检查个体数据,并进一步表明传统的损伤与综合征对应关系似乎过于简单化,应该进行彻底重新审视。