Ruggeri Mirella, Bonetto Chiara, Lasalvia Antonio, Fioritti Angelo, de Girolamo Giovanni, Santonastaso Paolo, Pileggi Francesca, Neri Giovanni, Ghigi Daniela, Giubilini Franco, Miceli Maurizio, Scarone Silvio, Cocchi Angelo, Torresani Stefano, Faravelli Carlo, Cremonese Carla, Scocco Paolo, Leuci Emanuela, Mazzi Fausto, Pratelli Michela, Bellini Francesca, Tosato Sarah, De Santi Katia, Bissoli Sarah, Poli Sara, Ira Elisa, Zoppei Silvia, Rucci Paola, Bislenghi Laura, Patelli Giovanni, Cristofalo Doriana, Meneghelli Anna
Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy;
Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1192-203. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv058. Epub 2015 May 20.
Integrated multi-element psychosocial interventions have been suggested to improve the outcomes of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients, but they have been studied primarily in experimental settings and in nonepidemiologically representative samples. Thus, we performed a cluster-randomized controlled trial, comparing an integrated multi-element psychosocial intervention, comprising cognitive behavioral therapy, family intervention, and case management, with treatment as usual (TAU) for FEP patients in 117 community mental health centers (CMHCs) in a large area of northern Italy (10 million inhabitants). The randomized units (clusters) were the CMHCs, and the units of observation the patients (and, when available, their family members). The primary hypotheses were that add-on multicomponent intervention: (1) results in greater improvements in symptoms, as assessed with positive and negative syndrome scale and (2) reduces in-hospital stay, based on days of hospitalization over the 9-month follow-up. Four hundred and forty-four FEP patients received the intervention or TAU and were assessed at baseline and 9 months. Based on the retention rates of patients (and families) in the experimental arm, multi-element psychosocial interventions can be implemented in routine mental health services. Regarding primary outcomes, patients in the experimental arm showed greater reductions in overall symptom severity, while no difference could be found for days of hospitalization. Among the secondary outcomes, greater improvements were detected in the experimental arm for global functioning, emotional well-being, and subjective burden of delusions. No difference could be found for service disengagement and subjective burden of auditory hallucinations. These findings support feasibility and effectiveness of early interventions for psychosis in generalist mental health services.
综合多元素心理社会干预已被建议用于改善首发精神病(FEP)患者的治疗效果,但这些干预主要是在实验环境中以及非流行病学代表性样本中进行研究的。因此,我们进行了一项整群随机对照试验,在意大利北部大片地区(1000万居民)的117个社区心理健康中心(CMHC),将包括认知行为疗法、家庭干预和病例管理的综合多元素心理社会干预与首发精神病患者的常规治疗(TAU)进行比较。随机分组单位(群组)是社区心理健康中心,观察单位是患者(以及如有可能,他们的家庭成员)。主要假设是附加多成分干预:(1)使用阳性和阴性症状量表评估时,能使症状有更大改善;(2)基于9个月随访期间的住院天数,能减少住院时间。444名首发精神病患者接受了干预或常规治疗,并在基线和9个月时进行了评估。根据实验组中患者(和家庭)的保留率,多元素心理社会干预可在常规心理健康服务中实施。关于主要结局,实验组患者的总体症状严重程度有更大程度的降低,而住院天数方面未发现差异。在次要结局中,实验组在整体功能、情绪幸福感和妄想主观负担方面有更大改善。在服务脱离和幻听主观负担方面未发现差异。这些发现支持了在普通心理健康服务中对精神病进行早期干预的可行性和有效性。