Rotenberg Martin, Graffi Justin, Anderson Kelly, Kurdyak Paul, Kozloff Nicole, Foussias George
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 29:7067437251337807. doi: 10.1177/07067437251337807.
ObjectivesEarly psychosis intervention (EPI) programs play a crucial role in detecting and treating psychosis early, yet disparities in access persist. This study aimed to assess the spatial accessibility of EPI programs in Toronto, Canada, and to explore the association between access and indicators of neighbourhood-level marginalization.MethodsWe conducted a geospatial analysis using floating catchment area and two-step floating catchment area methods, examining EPI program locations, census population estimates for the 158 Toronto neighbourhoods, and area-level marginalization data. Spatial regression models were used to estimate the association between marginalization factors and spatial accessibility.ResultsOn average, the closest EPI program is 4 km away from the centre of any given neighbourhood (range 0.8-11 km), with variability across the city. Clustering is observed in some neighbourhoods, indicating better spatial accessibility, whereas other neighbourhoods face lower access. A full spatial regression model showed increasing levels of housing and dwelling marginalization, as well as material resource marginalization, to be associated with better access.ConclusionWe identified neighbourhoods that have poorer spatial accessibility to EPI services. Some neighbourhood-level marginalization indicators previously found to be associated with psychosis risk are also associated with better spatial accessibility. It is notable that EPI services in Toronto may be located where they are most needed the most. The study underscores the importance of geospatial analyses to identify and address geographic distance as a potential source of disparity in access.
目标
早期精神病干预(EPI)项目在早期发现和治疗精神病方面发挥着关键作用,但在获取服务方面的差异依然存在。本研究旨在评估加拿大多伦多市EPI项目的空间可达性,并探讨获取服务情况与社区层面边缘化指标之间的关联。
方法
我们使用浮动集水区和两步浮动集水区方法进行了地理空间分析,研究了EPI项目的位置、多伦多158个社区的人口普查估计数以及区域层面的边缘化数据。使用空间回归模型来估计边缘化因素与空间可达性之间的关联。
结果
平均而言,距离任何给定社区中心最近的EPI项目距离为4公里(范围为0.8 - 11公里),全市存在差异。在一些社区观察到集聚现象,表明空间可达性较好,而其他社区的可达性较低。一个完整的空间回归模型显示,住房和居住边缘化程度的增加以及物质资源边缘化与更好的可达性相关。
结论
我们确定了EPI服务空间可达性较差的社区。一些先前发现与精神病风险相关的社区层面边缘化指标也与更好的空间可达性相关。值得注意的是,多伦多的EPI服务可能位于最需要的地方。该研究强调了地理空间分析对于识别和解决地理距离作为获取服务差异潜在来源的重要性。