Wurm Moritz F, Lingnau Angelika
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, 38100 Mattarello, Italy and
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, 38100 Mattarello, Italy and Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy.
J Neurosci. 2015 May 20;35(20):7727-35. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0188-15.2015.
Brain regions that mediate action understanding must contain representations that are action specific and at the same time tolerate a wide range of perceptual variance. Whereas progress has been made in understanding such generalization mechanisms in the object domain, the neural mechanisms to conceptualize actions remain unknown. In particular, there is ongoing dissent between motor-centric and cognitive accounts whether premotor cortex or brain regions in closer relation to perceptual systems, i.e., lateral occipitotemporal cortex, contain neural populations with such mapping properties. To date, it is unclear to which degree action-specific representations in these brain regions generalize from concrete action instantiations to abstract action concepts. However, such information would be crucial to differentiate between motor and cognitive theories. Using ROI-based and searchlight-based fMRI multivoxel pattern decoding, we sought brain regions in human cortex that manage the balancing act between specificity and generality. We investigated a concrete level that distinguishes actions based on perceptual features (e.g., opening vs closing a specific bottle), an intermediate level that generalizes across movement kinematics and specific objects involved in the action (e.g., opening different bottles with cork or screw cap), and an abstract level that additionally generalizes across object category (e.g., opening bottles or boxes). We demonstrate that the inferior parietal and occipitotemporal cortex code actions at abstract levels whereas the premotor cortex codes actions at the concrete level only. Hence, occipitotemporal, but not premotor, regions fulfill the necessary criteria for action understanding. This result is compatible with cognitive theories but strongly undermines motor theories of action understanding.
介导动作理解的脑区必须包含特定于动作的表征,同时能容忍广泛的感知差异。虽然在理解物体领域的这种泛化机制方面已取得进展,但将动作概念化的神经机制仍然未知。特别是,以运动为中心的观点和认知观点之间存在争议,即运动前皮层或与感知系统关系更密切的脑区(即外侧枕颞皮层)是否包含具有这种映射属性的神经群体。迄今为止,尚不清楚这些脑区中特定于动作的表征在多大程度上能从具体的动作实例泛化到抽象的动作概念。然而,此类信息对于区分运动理论和认知理论至关重要。利用基于感兴趣区(ROI)和基于搜索light的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)多体素模式解码,我们在人类皮层中寻找管理特异性和一般性之间平衡的脑区。我们研究了一个基于感知特征区分动作的具体水平(例如,打开或关闭特定瓶子)、一个跨动作运动学和动作中涉及的特定物体进行泛化的中间水平(例如,用软木塞或螺旋盖打开不同瓶子)以及一个额外跨物体类别进行泛化的抽象水平(例如,打开瓶子或盒子)。我们证明,顶下小叶和枕颞皮层在抽象水平上对动作进行编码,而运动前皮层仅在具体水平上对动作进行编码。因此,枕颞区而非运动前区满足动作理解的必要标准。这一结果与认知理论相符,但强烈削弱了动作理解的运动理论。