Lesourd Mathieu, Osiurak François, Martin Julie, Hague Sébastien, Laroze Margolise, Clément Gautier, Medeiros de Bustos Elisabeth, Fargeix Guillaume, Magnin Eloi, Moulin Thierry
Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, F-25000, Besançon, France.
Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de l'Environnement (UAR 3124), Besançon, France.
Commun Biol. 2025 Apr 3;8(1):552. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07923-1.
Action tool knowledge can be assessed mainly with two kinds of tasks: tool-tool and hand-tool compatibility tasks. While these tasks are used to assess action tool knowledge, recent data showed striking dissociations between these tasks in brain-damaged patients. In this study, we explored the neuropsychological dissociations (Experiment 1; 60 brain-damaged patients) and the potential cognitive mechanisms engaged during these two tasks (Experiment 2; 52 healthy participants). Finally, we also reanalyzed fMRI data to investigate the neural bases engaged in tool-tool and hand-tool compatibility tasks (Experiment 3; 34 healthy participants). The three experiments provide convergent arguments by showing that both tasks share common core computations supported by a left-lateralized brain network, but hand-tool compatibility task engages regions outside of this brain network and is explained by visual imagery while tool-tool task is rather explained by motor imagery. Our results shed a new light on action tool knowledge tasks.
工具-工具和手-工具兼容性任务。虽然这些任务用于评估动作工具知识,但最近的数据显示,在脑损伤患者中,这些任务之间存在显著的分离。在本研究中,我们探讨了神经心理学上的分离(实验1;60名脑损伤患者)以及这两项任务中涉及的潜在认知机制(实验2;52名健康参与者)。最后,我们还重新分析了功能磁共振成像数据,以研究工具-工具和手-工具兼容性任务中涉及的神经基础(实验3;34名健康参与者)。这三个实验提供了一致的论据,表明这两项任务都共享由左侧大脑网络支持的共同核心计算,但手-工具兼容性任务涉及该大脑网络之外的区域,并且由视觉表象来解释,而工具-工具任务则更多地由运动表象来解释。我们的结果为动作工具知识任务提供了新的见解。