d'Hoedt B, Schulte W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Summer;4(2):95-105.
The results of regular follow-up of various endosseous titanium implant systems are presented together with an overview of the results with Tübingen Frialit aluminum oxide ceramic implants. Using ITI implants, pathological findings for sulcus depth and peri-implant bone degradation were found significantly more frequently than with the other titanium implants. Clinical mobility was present significantly more frequently with TPS implants than with the IMZ system, whereas an increase in the depth of the peri-implant sulcus alone occurred significantly more frequently with the IMZ and ITI than with the TPS implant system. The observation period for Brånemark implants is too short to permit final evaluation. However, pathological findings have not occurred to date.
本文展示了各种骨内钛种植体系统的定期随访结果，并概述了图宾根Frialit氧化铝陶瓷种植体的结果。使用ITI种植体时，龈沟深度和种植体周围骨吸收的病理表现比其他钛种植体更为常见。TPS种植体的临床动度比IMZ系统更为常见，而仅种植体周围龈沟深度增加在IMZ和ITI种植体中比TPS种植体系统更为常见。Brånemark种植体的观察期太短，无法进行最终评估。然而，迄今为止尚未出现病理表现。
