• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安大略省急诊科流程改进计划:实施经验

Ontario's emergency department process improvement program: the experience of implementation.

作者信息

Rotteau Leahora, Webster Fiona, Salkeld Erin, Hellings Chelsea, Guttmann Astrid, Vermeulen Marian J, Bell Robert S, Zwarenstein Merrick, Rowe Brian H, Nigam Amit, Schull Michael J

机构信息

The Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(6):720-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12688. Epub 2015 May 20.

DOI:10.1111/acem.12688
PMID:25996451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5032978/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, Lean manufacturing principles have been applied to health care quality improvement efforts to improve wait times. In Ontario, an emergency department (ED) process improvement program based on Lean principles was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care as part of a strategy to reduce ED length of stay (LOS) and to improve patient flow. This article aims to describe the hospital-based teams' experiences during the ED process improvement program implementation and the teams' perceptions of the key factors that influenced the program's success or failure.

METHODS

A qualitative evaluation was conducted based on semistructured interviews with hospital implementation team members, such as team leads, medical leads, and executive sponsors, at 10 purposively selected hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Sites were selected based, in part, on their changes in median ED LOS following the implementation period. A thematic framework approach as used for interviews, and a standard thematic coding framework was developed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four interviews were coded and analyzed. The results are organized according to participants' experience and are grouped into four themes that were identified as significantly affecting the implementation experience: local contextual factors, relationship between improvement team and support players, staff engagement, and success and sustainability. The results demonstrate the importance of the context of implementation, establishing strong relationships and communication strategies, and preparing for implementation and sustainability prior to the start of the project.

CONCLUSIONS

Several key factors were identified as important to the success of the program, such as preparing for implementation, ensuring strong executive support, creation of implementation teams based on the tasks and outcomes of the initiative, and using multiple communication strategies throughout the implementation process. Explicit incorporation of these factors into the development and implementation of future similar interventions in health care settings could be useful.

摘要

目标

近年来,精益制造原则已应用于医疗保健质量改进工作,以缩短等待时间。在安大略省,卫生和长期护理部引入了一项基于精益原则的急诊科(ED)流程改进计划,作为减少急诊科住院时间(LOS)和改善患者流程战略的一部分。本文旨在描述医院团队在急诊科流程改进计划实施过程中的经验,以及团队对影响该计划成败的关键因素的看法。

方法

基于对加拿大安大略省10家有目的地选择的医院的医院实施团队成员(如团队负责人、医疗负责人和执行发起人)的半结构化访谈,进行了定性评估。部分站点是根据实施期后急诊科中位住院时间的变化来选择的。采用主题框架方法进行访谈,并制定了标准的主题编码框架。

结果

对24次访谈进行了编码和分析。结果根据参与者的经验进行组织,并分为四个主题,这些主题被确定为对实施经验有重大影响:当地背景因素、改进团队与支持人员之间的关系、员工参与度以及成功与可持续性。结果表明了实施背景、建立牢固关系和沟通策略以及在项目开始前为实施和可持续性做好准备的重要性。

结论

确定了几个对该计划成功至关重要的关键因素,如为实施做准备、确保强有力的行政支持、根据倡议的任务和成果创建实施团队,以及在整个实施过程中使用多种沟通策略。将这些因素明确纳入未来医疗保健环境中类似干预措施的开发和实施中可能会有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dafa/5032978/902ca9d13a86/ACEM-22-720-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dafa/5032978/902ca9d13a86/ACEM-22-720-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dafa/5032978/902ca9d13a86/ACEM-22-720-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ontario's emergency department process improvement program: the experience of implementation.安大略省急诊科流程改进计划:实施经验
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(6):720-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12688. Epub 2015 May 20.
2
Evaluation of an emergency department lean process improvement program to reduce length of stay.评估急诊科精益流程改进项目以缩短住院时间。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;64(5):427-38. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of patient flow improvement strategies.患者流程改善策略实施的促进因素和障碍
Qual Manag Health Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;20(3):223-33. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e318222a3b0.
4
Applying the Lean principles of the Toyota Production System to reduce wait times in the emergency department.将丰田生产系统的精益原则应用于急诊科,以减少等待时间。
CJEM. 2010 Jan;12(1):50-7. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012021.
5
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Ontario's emergency department clinical decision unit pilot program: a qualitative study.安大略省急诊科临床决策单元试点项目实施的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
CJEM. 2011 Nov;13(6):363-71. doi: 10.2310/8000.2011.110380.
6
Increasing Throughput: Results from a 42-Hospital Collaborative to Improve Emergency Department Flow.提高吞吐量:42家医院合作改善急诊科流程的结果。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Dec;41(12):532-42. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41070-0.
7
Effects of organizational context on Lean implementation in five hospital systems.组织环境对五个医院系统中精益实施的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Apr-Jun;41(2):127-44. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000049.
8
Factors associated with sustainability of 2 quality improvement programs after achieving early implementation success. A qualitative case study.在早期实施成功后与两个质量改进项目可持续性相关的因素。一项定性案例研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1135-1143. doi: 10.1111/jep.12735. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
9
National targets, process transformation and local consequences in an NHS emergency department (ED): a qualitative study.国家目标、流程转型与英国国家医疗服务体系急诊部的地方后果:一项定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2014 Jun 13;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-14-12.
10
Time and expenses associated with the implementation of strategies to reduce emergency department crowding.与实施减少急诊科拥挤策略相关的时间和费用。
J Emerg Nurs. 2012 Sep;38(5):420-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Process Improvement Approaches for Increasing the Response of Emergency Departments against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.应对 COVID-19 大流行的急诊科响应改进方法:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;18(16):8814. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168814.
2
A Systematic Review on Lean Applications' in Emergency Departments.急诊科精益应用的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 19;9(6):763. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060763.
3
Benchmarking outcomes on multiple contextual levels in lean healthcare: a systematic review, development of a conceptual framework, and a research agenda.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of an emergency department lean process improvement program to reduce length of stay.评估急诊科精益流程改进项目以缩短住院时间。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;64(5):427-38. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
2
Implementing an organization-wide quality improvement initiative: insights from project leads, managers, and frontline nurses.实施全组织范围的质量改进计划:来自项目负责人、管理人员和一线护士的见解。
Nurs Adm Q. 2013 Jul-Sep;37(3):222-30. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0b013e318295ec9f.
3
Evaluating the effect of clinical decision units on patient flow in seven Canadian emergency departments.
在精益医疗保健中多个上下文层面进行基准测试的结果:系统评价、概念框架的制定和研究议程。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06160-6.
4
Study protocol for IMAGE: implementing multidisciplinary assessments for geriatric patients in an emergency department observation unit, a hybrid effectiveness/implementation study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.IMAGE研究方案:在急诊科观察单元对老年患者实施多学科评估,一项使用实施研究综合框架的有效性/实施混合研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:28. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00015-7. eCollection 2020.
5
Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic review.定义和评估医疗保健实施研究中的背景:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05212-7.
6
The barriers and facilitators influencing the sustainability of hospital-based interventions: a systematic review.影响基于医院的干预措施可持续性的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 28;20(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05434-9.
7
The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review.语境因素对医疗质量改进措施的影响:一个现实主义的综述。
Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 26;9(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01344-3.
8
Methodological Approaches to Support Process Improvement in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.方法学途径支持急诊科流程改进:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 13;17(8):2664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082664.
9
SurgeCon: Priming a Community Emergency Department for Patient Flow Management.SurgeCon:为患者流程管理做好社区急诊部的准备。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;20(4):654-665. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42027. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
10
Using behaviour change and implementation science to address low referral rates in oncology.运用行为改变与实施科学来解决肿瘤学中转诊率低的问题。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 28;18(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3653-1.
评价临床决策单元对加拿大 7 家急诊科患者流程的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;19(7):828-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01396.x.
4
Explaining variation in perceived team effectiveness: results from eleven quality improvement collaboratives.解释感知团队有效性的差异:来自十一个质量改进合作的结果。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Jun;22(11-12):1692-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04120.x. Epub 2012 May 22.
5
Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature.改善医疗保健质量的十大挑战:来自健康基金会项目评估和相关文献的经验教训。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Oct;21(10):876-84. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000760. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
6
Findings from a national improvement collaborative: are improvements sustained?一项全国性改进合作研究的结果:改进是否得以持续?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug;21(8):663-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000243. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research.新计划和创新的可持续性:对实证文献的回顾和对未来研究的建议。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.
8
How does lean work in emergency care? A case study of a lean-inspired intervention at the Astrid Lindgren Children's hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.精益在急救护理中如何发挥作用?瑞典斯德哥尔摩阿斯特里德·林格伦儿童医院一项精益干预的案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb 1;12:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-28.
9
ED overcrowding: the Ontario approach.急诊拥挤:安大略省的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1242-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01220.x.
10
The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement.理解质量成功模型(MUSIQ):在医疗保健质量改进中构建一个语境理论。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):13-20. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000010. Epub 2011 Aug 10.