Bretscher P A
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Scand J Immunol. 2015 Aug;82(2):147-59. doi: 10.1111/sji.12315.
Despite an agreement on most issues surrounding models for how lymphocytes are activated and inactivated, and arising out of the 1970 Two Signal Model of lymphocyte activation, Cohn and I have different perspectives on two critical issues concerning the activation of CD4 T cells. One issue is the origin of the first effector T helper (eTh) cells, postulated by both of us to be required to optimally activate precursor Th (pTh), that is naïve CD4 T cells, to further generate eTh cells. The second issue arises from our agreement that the antigen-dependent CD4 T cell cooperation, that we both postulate is required to activate naïve CD4 T (pTh) cells, most likely is mediated by the operational recognition of linked epitopes. Although agreeing on the centrality of this operational mechanism, we disagree about how it might be realized at the molecular/cellular level. I respond here to issues raised by Cohn concerning these two mechanistic questions, in his response to my recent article on the activation and inactivation of mature CD4 T cells.
尽管围绕淋巴细胞激活和失活模型的大多数问题已达成共识,且该共识源自1970年的淋巴细胞激活双信号模型,但科恩和我在关于CD4 T细胞激活的两个关键问题上存在不同观点。一个问题是首批效应性辅助性T细胞(eTh)的起源,我们两人都假定其对于最佳激活前体辅助性T细胞(pTh)(即初始CD4 T细胞)以进一步产生eTh细胞是必需的。第二个问题源于我们的共识,即我们都假定激活初始CD4 T(pTh)细胞所需的抗原依赖性CD4 T细胞协作很可能是由连锁表位的操作性识别介导的。尽管我们都认同这一操作机制的核心地位,但在其如何在分子/细胞水平上实现这一点上存在分歧。在此,我回应科恩在其对我最近关于成熟CD4 T细胞激活和失活的文章的回应中提出的关于这两个机制问题的疑问。