Haider Adil H, Schneider Eric B, Sriram N, Scott Valerie K, Swoboda Sandra M, Zogg Cheryl K, Dhiman Nitasha, Haut Elliott R, Efron David T, Pronovost Peter J, Freischlag Julie A, Lipsett Pamela A, Cornwell Edward E, MacKenzie Ellen J, Cooper Lisa A
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jun;220(6):1077-1086.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.065. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
Implicit bias is an unconscious preference for a specific social group that can have adverse consequences for patient care. Acute care clinical vignettes were used to examine whether implicit race or class biases among registered nurses (RNs) impacted patient-management decisions.
In a prospective study conducted among surgical RNs at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, participants were presented 8 multi-stage clinical vignettes in which patients' race or social class were randomly altered. Registered nurses were administered implicit association tests (IATs) for social class and race. Ordered logistic regression was then used to examine associations among treatment differences, race, or social class, and RN's IAT scores. Spearman's rank coefficients comparing RN's implicit (IAT) and explicit (stated) preferences were also investigated.
Two hundred and forty-five RNs participated. The majority were female (n=217 [88.5%]) and white (n=203 [82.9%]). Most reported that they had no explicit race or class preferences (n=174 [71.0%] and n=108 [44.1%], respectively). However, only 36 nurses (14.7%) demonstrated no implicit race preference as measured by race IAT, and only 16 nurses (6.53%) displayed no implicit class preference on the class IAT. Implicit association tests scores did not statistically correlate with vignette-based clinical decision making. Spearman's rank coefficients comparing implicit (IAT) and explicit preferences also demonstrated no statistically significant correlation (r=-0.06; p=0.340 and r=-0.06; p=0.342, respectively).
The majority of RNs displayed implicit preferences toward white race and upper social class patients on IAT assessment. However, unlike published data on physicians, implicit biases among RNs did not correlate with clinical decision making.
隐性偏见是对特定社会群体的无意识偏好,可能对患者护理产生不利影响。急性护理临床案例用于检验注册护士(RN)中隐性的种族或阶层偏见是否会影响患者管理决策。
在约翰霍普金斯医院对外科注册护士进行的一项前瞻性研究中,向参与者展示了8个多阶段临床案例,其中患者的种族或社会阶层被随机改变。对注册护士进行社会阶层和种族的隐性关联测试(IAT)。然后使用有序逻辑回归来检验治疗差异、种族或社会阶层与注册护士IAT分数之间的关联。还研究了比较注册护士隐性(IAT)和显性(陈述)偏好的斯皮尔曼等级系数。
245名注册护士参与。大多数为女性(n = 217 [88.5%])且为白人(n = 203 [82.9%])。大多数人报告称他们没有明确的种族或阶层偏好(分别为n = 174 [71.0%]和n = 108 [44.1%])。然而,通过种族IAT测量,只有36名护士(14.7%)没有表现出隐性种族偏好,在阶层IAT上只有16名护士(6.53%)没有表现出隐性阶层偏好。隐性关联测试分数与基于案例的临床决策在统计学上没有相关性。比较隐性(IAT)和显性偏好的斯皮尔曼等级系数也没有显示出统计学上的显著相关性(分别为r = -0.06;p = 0.340和r = -0.06;p = 0.342)。
在IAT评估中,大多数注册护士对白人种族和社会上层阶级患者表现出隐性偏好。然而,与已发表的关于医生的数据不同,注册护士中的隐性偏见与临床决策没有相关性。