Suppr超能文献

迈向医疗保健领域的高性能管理系统,第4部分:运用高性能工作实践预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染——一项比较案例研究。

Toward a high-performance management system in health care, part 4: Using high-performance work practices to prevent central line-associated blood stream infections-a comparative case study.

作者信息

McAlearney Ann Scheck, Hefner Jennifer, Robbins Julie, Garman Andrew N

机构信息

Ann Scheck McAlearney, ScD, MS, is Professor and Vice Chair for Research, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, and Professor, Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus. E-mail:

出版信息

Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Jul-Sep;41(3):233-43. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000067.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are among the most harmful health care-associated infections and a major patient safety concern. Nationally, CLABSI rates have been reduced through the implementation of evidence-based interventions; thus far, however, hospitals still differ substantially in their success implementing these practices. Prior research on high-performance work practices (HPWPs) suggests that these practices may explain some of the differences health systems experience in the success of their quality improvement efforts; however, these relationships have not yet been systematically investigated.

PURPOSES

In this study, we sought to explore the potential role HPWPs may play in explaining differences in the success of CLABSI reduction efforts involving otherwise similar organizations and approaches.

METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: To form our sample, we identified eight hospitals participating in the federally funded "On the CUSP: Stop BSI" initiative. This sample included four hospital "pairs" matched on organizational characteristics (e.g., state, size, teaching status) but having reported contrasting CLABSI reduction outcomes. We collected data through site visits as well as 194 key informant interviews, which were framed using an evidence-informed model of health care HPWPs.

FINDINGS

We found evidence that, at higher performing sites, HPWPs facilitated the adoption and consistent application of practices known to prevent CLABSIs; these HPWPs were virtually absent at lower performing sites. We present examples of management practices and illustrative quotes categorized into four HPWP subsystems: (a) staff engagement, (b) staff acquisition/development, (c) frontline empowerment, and (d) leadership alignment/development.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

We present the HPWP model as an organizing framework that can be applied to facilitate quality and patient safety efforts in health care. Managers and senior leaders can use these four HPWP subsystems to select, prioritize, and communicate about management practices critical to the success of their CLABSI prevention efforts.

摘要

背景

中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)是最具危害性的医疗相关感染之一,也是患者安全的主要关注点。在全国范围内,通过实施循证干预措施,CLABSI发生率已有所降低;然而,到目前为止,医院在成功实施这些措施方面仍存在很大差异。先前关于高绩效工作实践(HPWP)的研究表明,这些实践可能解释了卫生系统在质量改进努力成功方面所经历的一些差异;然而,这些关系尚未得到系统研究。

目的

在本研究中,我们试图探讨HPWP在解释涉及其他方面相似的组织和方法的CLABSI减少努力成功差异方面可能发挥的潜在作用。

方法/途径:为了形成我们的样本,我们确定了八家参与联邦资助的“在关键时刻:阻止BSI”倡议的医院。该样本包括四对医院,它们在组织特征(如州、规模、教学状况)上匹配,但报告的CLABSI减少结果形成对比。我们通过实地考察以及194次关键 informant访谈收集数据,这些访谈采用了基于证据的医疗保健HPWP模型。

结果

我们发现有证据表明,在绩效较高的地点,HPWP促进了已知预防CLABSI的实践的采用和持续应用;而在绩效较低的地点,这些HPWP实际上并不存在。我们给出了管理实践的例子以及分类为四个HPWP子系统的说明性引述:(a)员工参与,(b)员工招聘/发展,(c)一线授权,以及(d)领导协调/发展。

实践意义

我们将HPWP模型作为一个组织框架呈现出来,可用于促进医疗保健中的质量和患者安全努力。管理人员和高级领导者可以使用这四个HPWP子系统来选择、确定优先次序,并就对其CLABSI预防努力成功至关重要的管理实践进行沟通。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验