Cohen Catherine Crawford, Pogorzelska-Maziarz Monika, Herzig Carolyn T A, Carter Eileen J, Bjarnadottir Ragnhildur, Semeraro Patricia, Travers Jasmine L, Stone Patricia W
Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.
Jefferson School of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):630-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003952. Epub 2015 May 22.
Isolation-based practices in nursing homes (NHs) differ from those in acute care. NHs must promote quality of life while preventing infection transmission. Practices used in NHs to reconcile these goals of care have not been characterised.
To explore decision-making in isolation-based infection prevention and control practices in NHs.
A qualitative study was conducted with staff (eg, staff nurses, infection prevention directors and directors of nursing) employed in purposefully sampled US NHs. Semistructured, role-specific interview guides were developed and interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using directed content analysis. The research team discussed emerging themes in weekly meetings to confirm consensus.
We inferred from 73 interviews in 10 NHs that there was variation between NHs in practices regarding who was isolated, when isolation-based practices took place, how they were implemented, and how they were tailored for each resident. Interviewees' decision-making depended on staff perceptions of acceptable transmission risk and resident quality of life. NH resources also influenced decision-making, including availability of private rooms, extent to which staff can devote time to isolation-based practices and communication tools. A lack of understanding of key infection prevention and control concepts was also revealed.
Current clinical guidelines are not specific enough to ensure consistent practice that meets care goals and resource constraints in NHs. However, new epidemiological research regarding effectiveness of varying isolation practices in this setting is needed to inform clinical practice. Further, additional infection prevention and control education for NH staff may be required.
养老院的隔离措施与急性护理环境中的不同。养老院必须在预防感染传播的同时提高生活质量。目前尚未明确养老院为协调这些护理目标所采用的措施。
探讨养老院基于隔离的感染预防与控制措施中的决策制定情况。
对美国部分经目的抽样选取的养老院工作人员(如注册护士、感染预防主任和护理主任)进行了一项定性研究。制定了半结构化、针对特定角色的访谈指南,访谈进行了数字录音,逐字转录,并采用定向内容分析法进行分析。研究团队在每周会议上讨论新出现的主题以确认共识。
通过对10家养老院的73次访谈,我们推断出不同养老院在隔离对象、隔离措施实施时间、实施方式以及如何针对每位居民进行调整等方面存在差异。受访者的决策取决于工作人员对可接受传播风险和居民生活质量的认知。养老院的资源也会影响决策,包括单人房间的可用性、工作人员投入隔离措施的时间以及沟通工具。此外,还发现工作人员对关键感染预防与控制概念缺乏了解。
当前的临床指南不够具体,无法确保在养老院中实现符合护理目标和资源限制的一致做法。然而,需要开展新的流行病学研究,以了解不同隔离措施在该环境中的有效性,从而为临床实践提供依据。此外,可能需要为养老院工作人员提供更多的感染预防与控制教育。