• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大脑中的语言结构:一项关于阅读中句法意外性的与注视相关的功能磁共振成像研究。

Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading.

作者信息

Henderson John M, Choi Wonil, Lowder Matthew W, Ferreira Fernanda

机构信息

University of California, Davis, USA.

University of California, Davis, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.050. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.050
PMID:26908322
Abstract

How is syntactic analysis implemented by the human brain during language comprehension? The current study combined methods from computational linguistics, eyetracking, and fMRI to address this question. Subjects read passages of text presented as paragraphs while their eye movements were recorded in an MRI scanner. We parsed the text using a probabilistic context-free grammar to isolate syntactic difficulty. Syntactic difficulty was quantified as syntactic surprisal, which is related to the expectedness of a given word's syntactic category given its preceding context. We compared words with high and low syntactic surprisal values that were equated for length, frequency, and lexical surprisal, and used fixation-related (FIRE) fMRI to measure neural activity associated with syntactic surprisal for each fixated word. We observed greater neural activity for high than low syntactic surprisal in two predicted cortical regions previously identified with syntax: left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and less robustly, left anterior superior temporal lobe (ATL). These results support the hypothesis that left IFG and ATL play a central role in syntactic analysis during language comprehension. More generally, the results suggest a broader cortical network associated with syntactic prediction that includes increased activity in bilateral IFG and insula, as well as fusiform and right lingual gyri.

摘要

在语言理解过程中,人类大脑是如何进行句法分析的?当前的研究结合了计算语言学、眼动追踪和功能磁共振成像等方法来解决这个问题。受试者在磁共振成像扫描仪中阅读以段落形式呈现的文本段落,同时记录他们的眼动。我们使用概率上下文无关语法对文本进行解析,以分离句法难度。句法难度被量化为句法意外度,它与给定单词在其前文语境下句法类别的预期性相关。我们比较了长度、频率和词汇意外度相等的高句法意外度值和低句法意外度值的单词,并使用与注视相关的功能磁共振成像(FIRE fMRI)来测量与每个注视单词的句法意外度相关的神经活动。我们在先前已确定与句法相关的两个预测皮质区域中观察到,高句法意外度比低句法意外度引发更强的神经活动:左侧额下回(IFG),以及强度稍弱的左侧颞上回前部(ATL)。这些结果支持了这样一种假设,即左侧额下回和颞上回前部在语言理解过程中的句法分析中起核心作用。更普遍地说,这些结果表明存在一个与句法预测相关的更广泛的皮质网络,包括双侧额下回和脑岛以及梭状回和右侧舌回的活动增加。

相似文献

1
Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading.大脑中的语言结构:一项关于阅读中句法意外性的与注视相关的功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.050. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
2
Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.眼动追踪与功能磁共振成像相结合揭示句子理解过程中语言预测的神经基础。
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
3
The role of the IFG and pSTS in syntactic prediction: Evidence from a parametric study of hierarchical structure in fMRI.中间前回和颞上沟后部在句法预测中的作用:来自功能磁共振成像中层次结构参数研究的证据。
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:106-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
4
Abstract linguistic structure correlates with temporal activity during naturalistic comprehension.摘要:语言结构与自然语言理解过程中的时间活动相关。
Brain Lang. 2016 Jun-Jul;157-158:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 19.
5
Semantics-weighted lexical surprisal modeling of naturalistic functional MRI time-series during spoken narrative listening.自然口语叙事聆听过程中功能性磁共振成像时间序列的语义加权词汇意外模型。
Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 15;222:117281. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117281. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Linguistic networks associated with lexical, semantic and syntactic predictability in reading: A fixation-related fMRI study.阅读中与词汇、语义和句法可预测性相关的语言网络:一项基于眼动的 fMRI 研究。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:224-240. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
7
Individual differences in sentence comprehension: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic and lexical processing demands.句子理解中的个体差异:句法和词汇加工需求的功能磁共振成像研究
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):1950-63. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1950.
8
Prediction During Natural Language Comprehension.自然语言理解中的预测
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jun;26(6):2506-2516. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv075. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
9
Development of a selective left-hemispheric fronto-temporal network for processing syntactic complexity in language comprehension.用于处理语言理解中句法复杂性的选择性左半球额颞叶网络的发展。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Mar;83:274-282. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
10
Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening.自然故事聆听过程中前颞叶的句法结构构建。
Brain Lang. 2012 Feb;120(2):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Fixating targets in visual search: The role of dorsal and ventral attention networks in the processing of relevance and rarity.视觉搜索中的注视目标:背侧和腹侧注意网络在相关性和稀有性处理中的作用。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jul 17;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00229. eCollection 2024.
2
Neural Networks for Semantic and Syntactic Prediction and Visual-Motor Statistical Learning in Adult Readers With and Without Dyslexia.用于有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍成年读者语义和句法预测以及视觉运动统计学习的神经网络
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Jul 22;6. doi: 10.1162/nol.a.8. eCollection 2025.
3
Reading comprehension in L1 and L2 readers: neurocomputational mechanisms revealed through large language models.
第一语言和第二语言阅读者的阅读理解:通过大语言模型揭示的神经计算机制
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 Jul 10;10(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00337-y.
4
A two-dimensional space of linguistic representations shared across individuals.个体间共享的语言表征二维空间。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 23:2025.05.21.655330. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.21.655330.
5
Language-specific neural dynamics extend syntax into the time domain.特定语言的神经动力学将句法扩展到时域。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 21;23(1):e3002968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002968. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Artificial Neural Network Language Models Predict Human Brain Responses to Language Even After a Developmentally Realistic Amount of Training.即使经过符合发育实际的训练量,人工神经网络语言模型仍能预测人类大脑对语言的反应。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Apr 1;5(1):43-63. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00137. eCollection 2024.
7
Localizing Syntactic Composition with Left-Corner Recurrent Neural Network Grammars.使用左角递归神经网络语法对句法结构进行定位
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Apr 1;5(1):201-224. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00118. eCollection 2024.
8
Surprisal From Language Models Can Predict ERPs in Processing Predicate-Argument Structures Only if Enriched by an Agent Preference Principle.只有通过主体偏好原则进行强化,语言模型的意外值才能预测谓词-论元结构处理过程中的事件相关电位。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Apr 1;5(1):167-200. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00121. eCollection 2024.
9
Lexical-Semantic Content, Not Syntactic Structure, Is the Main Contributor to ANN-Brain Similarity of fMRI Responses in the Language Network.词汇语义内容而非句法结构是语言网络中功能磁共振成像反应的人工神经网络与大脑相似性的主要贡献因素。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Apr 1;5(1):7-42. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00116. eCollection 2024.
10
Diverging neural dynamics for syntactic structure building in naturalistic speaking and listening.自然语言听说中句法结构构建的神经动力学差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 12;121(11):e2310766121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310766121. Epub 2024 Mar 5.