Beggs D S, Fisher A D, Jongman E C, Hemsworth P E
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, 3030, Australia.
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, 3030, Australia.
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Aug;98(8):5330-8. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9239. Epub 2015 May 23.
Although large herds (more than 500 cows) only represent 13% of Australian dairy farms, they represent more than 35% of the cows milked. A survey of Australian dairy farmers was conducted to assess relationships between herd size and known or proposed risk factors for adverse animal welfare outcomes in Australian dairy herds in relation to increasing scale of production. Responses from 863 Australian dairy farms (13% of Australian dairy farms) were received. Increasing herd size was associated with increases in stocking density, stock per labor unit, and grain fed per day-all of which could reasonably be hypothesized to increase the risk of adverse welfare outcomes unless carefully managed. However, increasing herd size was also associated with an increased likelihood of staff with formal and industry-based training qualifications. Herd size was not associated with reported increases in mastitis or lameness treatments. Some disease conditions, such as milk fever, gut problems, and down cows, were reported less in larger herds. Larger herds were more likely to have routine veterinary herd health visits, separate milking of the main herd and the sick herd, transition diets before calving, and written protocols for disease treatment. They were more likely to use monitoring systems such as electronic identification in the dairy, computerized records, daily milk yield or cell count monitoring, and pedometers or activity meters. Euthanasia methods were consistent between herds of varying sizes, and it was noted that less than 3% of farms make use of captive-bolt devices despite their effectiveness and ready availability. Increasing herd size was related to increased herd milking time, increased time away from the paddock, and increased distance walked. If the milking order of cows is consistent, this may result in reduced feed access for late-milking-order cows because of a difference in time away from the paddock. More than 95% of farmers believed that their cows were content most of the time, and cows were reported as well behaved on more than 90% of farms. Although the potential animal welfare issues appear to be different between herd sizes, no evidence existed for a relationship between herd size and adverse welfare outcomes in terms of reported disease or cow contentment levels.
尽管大牧群(超过500头奶牛)仅占澳大利亚奶牛场的13%,但它们产出的牛奶却占挤奶总量的35%以上。为评估澳大利亚奶牛场的牧群规模与已知或潜在的不利于动物福利的风险因素之间的关系(这些因素与生产规模扩大相关),对澳大利亚奶农进行了一项调查。共收到来自863个澳大利亚奶牛场(占澳大利亚奶牛场总数的13%)的回复。牧群规模的扩大与饲养密度增加、单位劳动力牲畜存栏数增加以及每日谷物喂养量增加相关——除非进行精心管理,否则可以合理推测所有这些因素都会增加不良福利结果的风险。然而,牧群规模的扩大也与拥有正规及行业培训资质的员工比例增加有关。牧群规模与乳腺炎或跛行治疗报告病例数的增加无关。在较大的牧群中,一些疾病状况,如产乳热、肠道问题和卧地不起的奶牛,报告病例较少。较大的牧群更有可能进行常规兽医群体健康检查、主群和病群分开挤奶、产犊前的过渡日粮以及疾病治疗的书面方案。它们更有可能使用监测系统,如奶牛场的电子识别、计算机化记录、每日产奶量或体细胞计数监测以及计步器或活动计。不同规模牧群的安乐死方法是一致的,并且注意到尽管栓击式宰牲器有效且易于获得,但不到3%的农场使用它。牧群规模的增加与挤奶时间增加、离开牧场的时间增加以及行走距离增加有关。如果奶牛的挤奶顺序一致,这可能会导致挤奶顺序靠后的奶牛由于离开牧场的时间不同而获得饲料的机会减少。超过95%的农民认为他们的奶牛大部分时间都很满足,并且在超过90%的农场中,奶牛被报告行为良好。尽管不同规模牧群中潜在的动物福利问题似乎有所不同,但就报告的疾病或奶牛满足程度而言,没有证据表明牧群规模与不良福利结果之间存在关联。