De-Sousa Karolini Tenffen, Benetton Juliana Bernardes, Pinheiro Machado Filho Luiz Carlos, Hötzel Maria José
Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada e Bem-Estar Animal, Departamento de Zootecnia e Desenvolvimento Rural, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jan 31;12:1448756. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1448756. eCollection 2025.
Male calves are not economically attractive for most dairy farms in the current system and are therefore considered surplus in the dairy industry. The issue has gained growing attention in many countries, due to economic and animal welfare implications. It is known that livestock extensionists play a crucial role in facilitating change and promoting sustainable practices among the farming community. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of Brazilian dairy extensionist regarding three potential solutions to the issue of male dairy calves: the use of sexed semen, rearing for beef, and culling at birth. Livestock extensionists from different regions of Brazil ( = 344) participated in an online survey and answered closed (multiple choice and Likert scale) and open questions. Most participants (63%) were male, 61% with ages ranging from 19 to 35 years old and 49% held a graduate education in veterinary medicine. The practice of culling male calves was generally rejected as unethical, while the use of sexed semen to reduce the birth of males was seen as having positive ethical (75%), environmental (77%), and animal welfare (81%) implications. However, participants considered it difficult to implement in small farms due to its high cost. Raising male calves for beef production was perceived as more economically viable for small and medium size (49%) than for large dairy farms (32%). In general, participants considered the fate of male dairy calves a complex issue, suggesting the need for more than one alternative to address it effectively. However, extensionists acknowledged not discussing the topic with farmers, indicating a potential lack of awareness or interest in the issue. It is possible that participants may not have received sufficient training or engaged in discussions on animal welfare issues, as this is a relatively new subject during their professional development. The nascent nature of the issue in Brazil emphasizes the need for comprehensive education and knowledge exchange initiatives in the industry, to ensure that practitioners are well-prepared to adopt best practices in male calf management. This may foster local discourse on the topic and the development of contextualized knowledge, a crucial step for addressing aspects of dairy farming sustainability.
在当前体系下,雄性犊牛对大多数奶牛场来说在经济上缺乏吸引力,因此在奶牛行业被视为过剩。由于经济和动物福利方面的影响,这个问题在许多国家日益受到关注。众所周知,畜牧推广人员在推动变革和促进农业社区的可持续做法方面发挥着关键作用。本研究旨在调查巴西奶牛推广人员对雄性奶牛犊问题的三种潜在解决方案的了解和态度:使用性别分选精液、饲养肉牛以及出生时淘汰。来自巴西不同地区的344名畜牧推广人员参与了一项在线调查,并回答了封闭式问题(多项选择题和李克特量表)以及开放式问题。大多数参与者(63%)为男性,61%的年龄在19至35岁之间,49%拥有兽医学研究生学历。淘汰雄性犊牛的做法通常因不道德而被拒绝,而使用性别分选精液以减少雄性犊牛的出生被视为具有积极的伦理(75%)、环境(77%)和动物福利(81%)影响。然而,参与者认为由于成本高昂,在小农场难以实施。对于中小型农场(49%)而言,饲养雄性犊牛用于牛肉生产比大型奶牛场(32%)在经济上更可行。总体而言,参与者认为雄性奶牛犊的命运是一个复杂的问题,这表明需要不止一种替代方案来有效解决它。然而,推广人员承认没有与农民讨论这个话题,这表明对该问题可能缺乏认识或兴趣。参与者可能没有接受过足够的培训或参与过关于动物福利问题的讨论,因为这在他们的职业发展中是一个相对较新的主题。该问题在巴西的新生性质强调了行业内全面教育和知识交流举措的必要性,以确保从业者做好准备采用雄性犊牛管理的最佳做法。这可能会促进关于该主题的本地讨论以及情境化知识的发展,这是解决奶牛养殖可持续性方面问题的关键一步。