Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术的技术会决定术后高血压吗?

Does the technique of carotid endarterectomy determine postoperative hypertension?

作者信息

Ben Ahmed Sabrina, Daniel Guillaume, Benezit Marie, Bailly Patrick, Aublet-Cuvelier Bruno, Mulliez Aurélien, Ribal Jean-Pierre, Rosset Eugenio

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;29(6):1272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 May 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HT) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a risk factor for postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, and neck hematoma. We compared the incidence of postoperative HT within the week after eversion CEA (e-CEA) and patch closure CEA (p-CEA). Postoperative HT was defined as a systolic blood pressure (sBP) ≥ 160 mm Hg and/or the need for postoperative vasodilatators. The aim of our study was to determine if the technique of CEA had an effect on postoperative HT.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and June 2011, we prospectively reviewed 560 consecutive endarterectomies (340 p-CEAs and 220 e-CEAs) performed in 443 patients under general anesthesia. All had >70% stenoses, 119 were symptomatic, and 441 asymptomatic. We compared preoperative, peroperative, and postoperative sBP and diastolic blood pressure, carotid sinus nerve block, postoperative intravenous and oral antihypertensive medications, neurologic and cardiac complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

The e-CEA group had a higher incidence of women (36.4% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.0002) and HT (85.0% vs. 78.2%, P = 0.04). The e-CEAs had a significantly higher incidence of carotid sinus nerve block (93.6% vs. 15.6%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of postoperative HT was not significantly different between the 2 groups (75.9% in the e-CEA group versus 68.5% in the p-CEA group, P = 0.06). The average postoperative sBP between postoperative hour (H) 2 and H12 was significantly higher in the e-CEA group but <160 mm Hg. The sBP dropped between H2 and H6, and this decrease was greater in the p-CEA group (30% vs. 15% in the e-CEA group). The need for postoperative antihypertensive medication was not different between the 2 groups. One independent risk factor of postoperative HT was identified: history of HT. The rate of postoperative complications was not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The e-CEA technique is not a risk factor and does not have an effect on postoperative HT. The postoperative sBP was more stable in this group. Eversion carotid endarterectomy has been considered, in the literature, as a risk factor of postoperative hypertension. We conducted a large prospective and comparative study of the endarterectomy technique by eversion and with conventional patch closure. The primary end point was the blood pressure value and the administration of antihypertensive treatment. Our study shows that postoperative hypertension after carotid endarterectomy is not related to the surgical technique. Changes in blood pressure after carotid endarterectomy by eversion are lower than those observed after conventional endarterectomy with patch closure. This technique prevents the occurrence of possible hypotension occurrence, which can be the cause of perioperative complications.

摘要

背景

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后发生高血压(HT)是术后心肌梗死、中风和颈部血肿的危险因素。我们比较了外翻式CEA(e-CEA)和补片修补式CEA(p-CEA)术后一周内HT的发生率。术后HT定义为收缩压(sBP)≥160 mmHg和/或术后需要使用血管扩张剂。我们研究的目的是确定CEA技术是否对术后HT有影响。

方法

在2010年1月至2011年6月期间,我们前瞻性地回顾了443例在全身麻醉下进行的560例连续内膜切除术(340例p-CEA和220例e-CEA)。所有患者均有>70%的狭窄,119例有症状,441例无症状。我们比较了术前、术中及术后的sBP和舒张压、颈动脉窦神经阻滞、术后静脉和口服抗高血压药物、神经和心脏并发症以及死亡率。

结果

e-CEA组女性发生率较高(36.4%对21.8%,P = 0.0002),HT发生率也较高(85.0%对78.2%,P = 0.04)。e-CEA组颈动脉窦神经阻滞发生率显著更高(93.6%对15.6%,P < 0.0001)。两组术后HT发生率无显著差异(e-CEA组为75.9%,p-CEA组为68.5%,P = 0.06)。e-CEA组术后第2小时(H)至第12小时的平均术后sBP显著更高,但<160 mmHg。sBP在H2至H6之间下降,p-CEA组下降幅度更大(p-CEA组为30%,e-CEA组为15%)。两组术后抗高血压药物的使用需求无差异。确定了术后HT的一个独立危险因素:HT病史。两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异。

结论

e-CEA技术不是危险因素,对术后HT无影响。该组术后sBP更稳定。在文献中,外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术被认为是术后高血压的一个危险因素。我们对外翻式和传统补片修补式内膜切除术技术进行了一项大型前瞻性比较研究。主要终点是血压值和抗高血压治疗的使用情况。我们的研究表明,颈动脉内膜切除术后的术后高血压与手术技术无关。外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术后血压变化低于传统补片修补式内膜切除术后观察到的变化。该技术可防止可能发生的低血压,而低血压可能是围手术期并发症的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验