• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术后颈部出血的预测因素。

Predictors of cervical bleeding after carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Morales Gisbert Sara Mercedes, Sala Almonacil Vicente Andrés, Zaragozá García Jose Miguel, Genovés Gascó Beatriz, Gómez Palonés Francisco Julián, Ortiz Monzón Eduardo

机构信息

Department of Angiology, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.

Department of Angiology, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;28(2):366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.011
PMID:24084273
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of severe cervical bleeding requiring reintervention after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), to identify its predictive parameters, and to find out the influence of these on major complications.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 502 CEAs carried out in 455 consecutive patients between 1995-2011 in our institution. The end points were: postoperative cervical bleeding that required reoperation and major postoperative complications (i.e., stroke, myocardial infarction, and death). Patients' demographics, antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment, anaesthetic technique, surgical details, and perioperative management were registered. The end point predictors were univariate and multivariate analyzed.

RESULTS

Neck bleeding after CEA occurred in 42 cases (8.4%), requiring reoperation in 28 cases (5.6%). In the univariate analysis, chronic anticoagulation and anticoagulation 24 hours before surgery were associated with reoperation for bleeding (16.6% vs. 4.8% [P = 0.02] and 17.8% vs. 4.7% [P = 0.014], respectively). The agent used for antiplatelet treatment before surgery was related to reoperation in the univariate analysis and was the only factor with statistical significance in the multivariate analysis: acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg (2.4%), ASA 300 mg (1.5%), clopidogrel 75 mg (7.8%), ASA 100 mg associated with clopidogrel (3.3%), triflusal (5.5%), and ticlopidine (2.2%); there was a higher incidence of reoperation only in the group of patients who had taken clopidogrel 24 hours before CEA (4.7% vs. 1.05% [P = 0.06], respectively) but without statistical significance (odds ratio: 2; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-4.84). No reoperations were registered using vein patch compared to prosthetic patch (0% vs. 6.1% [P = 0.028]). Conversion to general anesthesia (22.2% vs. 4.9% [P = 0.014]) and noncontrollable postoperative hypertension (6.9% vs. 2.5% [P = 0.028]) were associated with a higher rate of reoperation. There were no statistically significant differences in the reoperation rates related to bleeding for anesthetic technique (local versus general), surgical procedure (classic endarterectomy versus eversion technique), type of prosthetic patch (Dacron/politetrafluoroethylene), use of shunt, intraoperative dose of heparin, protamine reversal, activated clotting time monitoring, or surgeon qualification level. The combined rate of stroke mortality was 2.6%. Reoperation for bleeding was not associated with an increased rate of thrombosis, stroke, death, or injury of cranial nerves.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative severe bleeding after carotid surgery in our institution is not an uncommon complication. Its incidence is within the range reported in the literature, but it is not associated with major complications or mortality. Antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel is the main risk factor associated with reintervention. Other factors, such as coagulation control, postoperative hypertension management, and the use of an autologous patch, could help reduce its incidence.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后需要再次干预的严重颈部出血的发生率,识别其预测参数,并了解这些因素对主要并发症的影响。

方法

这是一项对1995年至2011年间在我们机构连续455例患者中进行的502例CEA手术的回顾性研究。终点指标为:术后需要再次手术的颈部出血以及术后主要并发症(即中风、心肌梗死和死亡)。记录患者的人口统计学资料、抗血小板和抗凝治疗、麻醉技术、手术细节以及围手术期管理情况。对终点指标的预测因素进行单因素和多因素分析。

结果

CEA术后颈部出血42例(8.4%),其中28例(5.6%)需要再次手术。单因素分析中,长期抗凝以及术前24小时抗凝与因出血再次手术相关(分别为16.6%对4.8%[P = 0.02]和17.8%对4.7%[P = 0.014])。术前使用的抗血小板治疗药物在单因素分析中与再次手术有关,且是多因素分析中唯一具有统计学意义的因素:阿司匹林(ASA)100mg(2.4%)、ASA 300mg(1.5%)、氯吡格雷75mg(7.8%)、ASA 100mg联合氯吡格雷(3.3%)、曲氟尿苷(5.5%)和噻氯匹定(2.2%);仅在CEA术前24小时服用氯吡格雷组再次手术发生率较高(分别为4.7%对1.05%[P = 0.06]),但无统计学意义(比值比:2;95%置信区间:0.95 - 4.84)。与人工血管补片相比,使用静脉补片未记录到再次手术情况(0%对6.1%[P = 0.028])。转为全身麻醉(22.2%对4.9%[P = 0.014])和术后难以控制的高血压(6.9%对2.5%[P = 0.028])与再次手术率较高相关。麻醉技术(局部麻醉与全身麻醉)、手术方式(经典内膜切除术与外翻技术)、人工血管补片类型(涤纶/聚四氟乙烯)、分流的使用、术中肝素剂量、鱼精蛋白中和、活化凝血时间监测或外科医生资质水平等因素与因出血再次手术率无统计学显著差异。中风死亡率的合并率为2.6%。因出血再次手术与血栓形成、中风、死亡或颅神经损伤发生率增加无关。

结论

在我们机构,颈动脉手术后的术后严重出血并非罕见并发症。其发生率在文献报道范围内,但与主要并发症或死亡率无关。氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗是与再次干预相关联的主要危险因素。其他因素,如凝血控制、术后高血压管理以及自体补片的使用,可能有助于降低其发生率。

相似文献

1
Predictors of cervical bleeding after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后颈部出血的预测因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;28(2):366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
2
Predictors of neck bleeding after eversion carotid endarterectomy.外翻颈动脉内膜切除术(外翻 CEA)后颈部出血的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):699-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.262.
3
Does the technique of carotid endarterectomy determine postoperative hypertension?颈动脉内膜切除术的技术会决定术后高血压吗?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;29(6):1272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 May 22.
4
The effect of eversion and conventional-patch technique in carotid surgery on postoperative hypertension.外翻与常规 patched 技术在颈动脉手术中对术后高血压的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.106. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
5
Restenosis after eversion vs patch closure carotid endarterectomy.外翻与补片修补颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jul;46(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.055.
6
Dual antiplatelet therapy reduces stroke but increases bleeding at the time of carotid endarterectomy.双重抗血小板治疗可降低颈动脉内膜切除术时的卒中风险,但会增加出血风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 May;63(5):1262-1270.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
[Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Antiaggregation Therapy].接受抗聚集治疗患者的颈动脉内膜切除术
Acta Med Croatica. 2016 Apr;70(2):131-8.
8
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Does Not Increase the Risk of Bleeding After Carotid Endarterectomy: Results of a Prospective Study.双重抗血小板治疗不会增加颈动脉内膜切除术后出血风险:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;40:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.09.012. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
Cranial nerve injury is associated with dual antiplatelet therapy use and cervical hematoma after carotid endarterectomy.颅神经损伤与颈动脉内膜切除术后双联抗血小板治疗的使用及颈部血肿有关。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(4):985-989.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
10
Intermediate-term outcome of carotid endarterectomy with bovine pericardial patch closure compared with Dacron patch and primary closure.牛心包补片与涤纶补片及直接缝合修复颈动脉内膜切除术的中期结果比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.007. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Postcarotid Endarterectomy Hematoma Induced Arrhythmia: Report of a Rare Case.颈动脉内膜剥脱术后血肿诱发心律失常:1例罕见病例报告。
Case Rep Vasc Med. 2023 Dec 4;2023:4633731. doi: 10.1155/2023/4633731. eCollection 2023.
2
A Multi-Centre, Single-Arm Clinical Study to Confirm Safety and Performance of PuraStat®, for the Management of Bleeding in Elective Carotid Artery Surgery.多中心、单臂临床研究,旨在确认 PuraStat®在择期颈动脉手术中管理出血的安全性和性能。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221144307. doi: 10.1177/10760296221144307.
3
A Stepwise Haemostasis Intraoperative Protocol Driven Reduction of Haematoma Rate Following Symptomatic Carotidendarterectomy.
一项逐步止血的术中方案可降低症状性颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的血肿发生率。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2023 Feb;57(2):154-158. doi: 10.1177/15385744221132136. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Management of De Novo Carotid Stenosis and Postintervention Restenosis-Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting-a Review of Literature.颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术治疗新发颈动脉狭窄和介入治疗后再狭窄的管理:文献复习。
Transl Stroke Res. 2019 Oct;10(5):460-474. doi: 10.1007/s12975-019-00693-z. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
5
American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.美国血液学会 2018 年静脉血栓栓塞症管理指南:抗凝治疗的最佳管理。
Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3257-3291. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024893.
6
Case Series about the Changed Antiplatelet Protocol for Carotid Endarterectomy in a Teaching Hospital: More Patients with Complications?教学医院中颈动脉内膜切除术抗血小板方案改变的病例系列:并发症患者更多?
Surg J (N Y). 2018 Nov 5;4(4):e220-e225. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675566. eCollection 2018 Oct.
7
Haematomas after carotid endarterectomy can be reduced by direct pressure to the neck postoperatively.颈动脉内膜切除术后的血肿可通过术后对颈部进行直接按压来减少。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Sep;100(7):580-583. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0109. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
8
Right carotid-cutaneous fistula and right carotid pseudoaneurysm formation secondary to a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch.右颈动脉-皮肤瘘及右颈动脉假性动脉瘤形成,继发于慢性感染的聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯补片。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2018 Jan-Mar;8(1):48-51. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_62_17.
9
Perioperative clopidogrel is associated with increased bleeding and blood transfusion at the time of lower extremity bypass.围手术期使用氯吡格雷与下肢搭桥手术时出血增加及输血相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1719-1728.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.102. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
Dual antiplatelet therapy reduces stroke but increases bleeding at the time of carotid endarterectomy.双重抗血小板治疗可降低颈动脉内膜切除术时的卒中风险,但会增加出血风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 May;63(5):1262-1270.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Mar 2.