Morales Gisbert Sara Mercedes, Sala Almonacil Vicente Andrés, Zaragozá García Jose Miguel, Genovés Gascó Beatriz, Gómez Palonés Francisco Julián, Ortiz Monzón Eduardo
Department of Angiology, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Angiology, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;28(2):366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of severe cervical bleeding requiring reintervention after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), to identify its predictive parameters, and to find out the influence of these on major complications.
This was a retrospective review of 502 CEAs carried out in 455 consecutive patients between 1995-2011 in our institution. The end points were: postoperative cervical bleeding that required reoperation and major postoperative complications (i.e., stroke, myocardial infarction, and death). Patients' demographics, antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment, anaesthetic technique, surgical details, and perioperative management were registered. The end point predictors were univariate and multivariate analyzed.
Neck bleeding after CEA occurred in 42 cases (8.4%), requiring reoperation in 28 cases (5.6%). In the univariate analysis, chronic anticoagulation and anticoagulation 24 hours before surgery were associated with reoperation for bleeding (16.6% vs. 4.8% [P = 0.02] and 17.8% vs. 4.7% [P = 0.014], respectively). The agent used for antiplatelet treatment before surgery was related to reoperation in the univariate analysis and was the only factor with statistical significance in the multivariate analysis: acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg (2.4%), ASA 300 mg (1.5%), clopidogrel 75 mg (7.8%), ASA 100 mg associated with clopidogrel (3.3%), triflusal (5.5%), and ticlopidine (2.2%); there was a higher incidence of reoperation only in the group of patients who had taken clopidogrel 24 hours before CEA (4.7% vs. 1.05% [P = 0.06], respectively) but without statistical significance (odds ratio: 2; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-4.84). No reoperations were registered using vein patch compared to prosthetic patch (0% vs. 6.1% [P = 0.028]). Conversion to general anesthesia (22.2% vs. 4.9% [P = 0.014]) and noncontrollable postoperative hypertension (6.9% vs. 2.5% [P = 0.028]) were associated with a higher rate of reoperation. There were no statistically significant differences in the reoperation rates related to bleeding for anesthetic technique (local versus general), surgical procedure (classic endarterectomy versus eversion technique), type of prosthetic patch (Dacron/politetrafluoroethylene), use of shunt, intraoperative dose of heparin, protamine reversal, activated clotting time monitoring, or surgeon qualification level. The combined rate of stroke mortality was 2.6%. Reoperation for bleeding was not associated with an increased rate of thrombosis, stroke, death, or injury of cranial nerves.
Postoperative severe bleeding after carotid surgery in our institution is not an uncommon complication. Its incidence is within the range reported in the literature, but it is not associated with major complications or mortality. Antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel is the main risk factor associated with reintervention. Other factors, such as coagulation control, postoperative hypertension management, and the use of an autologous patch, could help reduce its incidence.
本研究旨在确定颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后需要再次干预的严重颈部出血的发生率,识别其预测参数,并了解这些因素对主要并发症的影响。
这是一项对1995年至2011年间在我们机构连续455例患者中进行的502例CEA手术的回顾性研究。终点指标为:术后需要再次手术的颈部出血以及术后主要并发症(即中风、心肌梗死和死亡)。记录患者的人口统计学资料、抗血小板和抗凝治疗、麻醉技术、手术细节以及围手术期管理情况。对终点指标的预测因素进行单因素和多因素分析。
CEA术后颈部出血42例(8.4%),其中28例(5.6%)需要再次手术。单因素分析中,长期抗凝以及术前24小时抗凝与因出血再次手术相关(分别为16.6%对4.8%[P = 0.02]和17.8%对4.7%[P = 0.014])。术前使用的抗血小板治疗药物在单因素分析中与再次手术有关,且是多因素分析中唯一具有统计学意义的因素:阿司匹林(ASA)100mg(2.4%)、ASA 300mg(1.5%)、氯吡格雷75mg(7.8%)、ASA 100mg联合氯吡格雷(3.3%)、曲氟尿苷(5.5%)和噻氯匹定(2.2%);仅在CEA术前24小时服用氯吡格雷组再次手术发生率较高(分别为4.7%对1.05%[P = 0.06]),但无统计学意义(比值比:2;95%置信区间:0.95 - 4.84)。与人工血管补片相比,使用静脉补片未记录到再次手术情况(0%对6.1%[P = 0.028])。转为全身麻醉(22.2%对4.9%[P = 0.014])和术后难以控制的高血压(6.9%对2.5%[P = 0.028])与再次手术率较高相关。麻醉技术(局部麻醉与全身麻醉)、手术方式(经典内膜切除术与外翻技术)、人工血管补片类型(涤纶/聚四氟乙烯)、分流的使用、术中肝素剂量、鱼精蛋白中和、活化凝血时间监测或外科医生资质水平等因素与因出血再次手术率无统计学显著差异。中风死亡率的合并率为2.6%。因出血再次手术与血栓形成、中风、死亡或颅神经损伤发生率增加无关。
在我们机构,颈动脉手术后的术后严重出血并非罕见并发症。其发生率在文献报道范围内,但与主要并发症或死亡率无关。氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗是与再次干预相关联的主要危险因素。其他因素,如凝血控制、术后高血压管理以及自体补片的使用,可能有助于降低其发生率。