• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BISAP评分预测重症急性胰腺炎的准确性。

Accuracy of BISAP score in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis.

作者信息

Arif Anum, Jaleel Farhat, Rashid Khalid

机构信息

Dr. Anum Arif, MBBS, FCPS. Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University of Health Sciences Karachi, Pakistan.

Dr. Farhat Jaleel, MBBS, FCPS. Professor, Head of Surgical Unit 6, Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Jul-Aug;35(4):1008-1012. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.4.1286.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.35.4.1286
PMID:31372133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6659069/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of BISAP score in comparison with Ranson's score in detection of severe acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

This cross sectional study was performed in Emergency department and Surgery department of Dow university hospital from January 2015 to December 2015. A total of 206 patients were included. Those diagnosed with acute pancreatitis on the basis of epigastric pain, serum amylase levels more than 300 (more than 3 times normal) and meeting the inclusion criteria were subjected to investigations for Ranson's and BISAP scoring. BISAP score was calculated at 24 hours and Ranson's score both at 24 and 48 hours. A score of > 3 was used to label severe acute pancreatitis according to both scoring systems.

RESULTS

In our study accuracy to predict SAP by BISAP score was 76.2 % and Ranson's score was 82.2%. On the basis of sensitivity, Ranson's scores predicted SAP more accurately than BISAP scores (97.4% vs. 69.2%). Regarding specificity, both scores predicted SAP almost equally (78.4% vs. 77.8%).

CONCLUSION

BISAP score is a valuable tool in predicting severe Acute Pancreatitis in early hours.

摘要

目的

比较BISAP评分与兰森评分在检测重症急性胰腺炎方面的准确性。

方法

本横断面研究于2015年1月至2015年12月在道氏大学医院急诊科和外科进行。共纳入206例患者。那些根据上腹部疼痛、血清淀粉酶水平超过300(超过正常水平3倍)且符合纳入标准而被诊断为急性胰腺炎的患者接受了兰森评分和BISAP评分调查。BISAP评分在24小时时计算,兰森评分在24小时和48小时时计算。根据两种评分系统,评分>3被用于标记重症急性胰腺炎。

结果

在我们的研究中,BISAP评分预测重症急性胰腺炎的准确性为76.2%,兰森评分为82.2%。基于敏感性,兰森评分预测重症急性胰腺炎比BISAP评分更准确(97.4%对69.2%)。关于特异性,两种评分预测重症急性胰腺炎几乎相同(78.4%对77.8%)。

结论

BISAP评分是早期预测重症急性胰腺炎的一个有价值的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b43b/6659069/036a7be4aa0f/PJMS-35-1008-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b43b/6659069/5b6e8fc431f5/PJMS-35-1008-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b43b/6659069/036a7be4aa0f/PJMS-35-1008-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b43b/6659069/5b6e8fc431f5/PJMS-35-1008-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b43b/6659069/036a7be4aa0f/PJMS-35-1008-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of BISAP score in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis.BISAP评分预测重症急性胰腺炎的准确性。
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Jul-Aug;35(4):1008-1012. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.4.1286.
2
Comparison of BISAP Score with Ranson's Score in Determining the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.BISAP评分与兰森评分在判定急性胰腺炎严重程度中的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 May;25(5):328-31.
3
Predicting morbidity and mortality in acute pancreatitis in an Indian population: a comparative study of the BISAP score, Ranson's score and CT severity index.预测印度人群急性胰腺炎的发病率和死亡率:BISAP 评分、Ranson 评分和 CT 严重指数的比较研究。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2016 Aug;4(3):216-20. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gov009. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
4
Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis.比较 BISAP、Ranson's、APACHE-II 和 CTSI 评分在预测急性胰腺炎器官衰竭、并发症和死亡率中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):435-41; quiz 442. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.622. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
5
Sequential organ failure assessment score is superior to other prognostic indices in acute pancreatitis.序贯器官衰竭评估评分在急性胰腺炎中优于其他预后指标。
World J Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 9;10(6):355-368. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i6.355.
6
Comparison of Scoring Systems in Predicting Severity and Prognosis of Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis.预测高甘油三酯血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度和预后的评分系统比较
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Apr;65(4):1206-1211. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05827-9. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
7
A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson's score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta Classification.基于2012年修订的亚特兰大分类法,比较急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、床边指数用于预测急性胰腺炎严重程度(BISAP)、兰森评分(Ranson's score)和改良CTSI。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018 May;6(2):127-131. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gox029. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
8
Comparison of the BISAP scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification.根据最新亚特兰大分类法比较BISAP评分对中国急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的预测价值
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Sep;21(9):689-694. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.118. Epub 2014 May 22.
9
[Early evaluations of BISAP plus C-reactive protein in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis].[BISAP联合C反应蛋白对急性胰腺炎严重程度预测的早期评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Mar 31;95(12):925-8.
10
Comparison of Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score with Ranson's Score in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.无害性急性胰腺炎评分与兰森评分在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度方面的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Feb;27(2):75-79.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical-CT mismatch in acute pancreatitis: a new concept and report of two cases.急性胰腺炎中的临床-CT不匹配:一个新概念及两例报告。
AME Case Rep. 2025 Jul 8;9:100. doi: 10.21037/acr-25-12. eCollection 2025.
2
Prognostic value of the international normalized ratio to albumin ratio in acute pancreatitis: insights from MIMIC-IV database.国际标准化比值与白蛋白比值在急性胰腺炎中的预后价值:来自MIMIC-IV数据库的见解
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 10;25(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04103-7.
3
Fatal, Fulminant, Necrotizing Pancreatitis Associated With Recent Tirzepatide Initiation.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of BISAP Score with Ranson's Score in Determining the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.BISAP评分与兰森评分在判定急性胰腺炎严重程度中的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 May;25(5):328-31.
2
Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.预测急性胰腺炎严重程度的评分系统比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2387-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2387.
3
Comparison of the BISAP scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification.
与近期开始使用替尔泊肽相关的致死性、暴发性、坏死性胰腺炎。
JCEM Case Rep. 2025 Apr 23;3(6):luaf087. doi: 10.1210/jcemcr/luaf087. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Management of acute pancreatitis in the "no man's land".“无人区”急性胰腺炎的管理
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 6. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03916-4.
5
Predictive Value of Several Parameters for Severity of Acute Pancreatitis in a Cohort of 172 Patients.172例急性胰腺炎患者中若干参数对病情严重程度的预测价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;15(4):435. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040435.
6
Prognostic significance of albumin corrected anion gap in patients with acute pancreatitis: a novel perspective.白蛋白校正阴离子间隙在急性胰腺炎患者中的预后意义:一种新视角。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):1318. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85773-x.
7
Assessment of frontal QRS-T angle in distinguishing mild and severe acute pancreatitis in emergency department: A retrospective study.评估急诊 QRS-T 角在鉴别轻症和重症急性胰腺炎中的作用:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 29;103(48):e40743. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040743.
8
Impact of metabolic syndrome components on clinical outcomes in hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis.代谢综合征组分对甘油三酯诱导性急性胰腺炎临床结局的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 21;30(35):3996-4010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i35.3996.
9
Association between triglyceride glucose-body mass index and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis.甘油三酯-血糖-体重指数与急性胰腺炎危重症患者全因死亡率的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):21605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72969-w.
10
Effect of probiotics combined with Ulinastatin and Somatostatin in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.益生菌联合乌司他丁和生长抑素治疗重症急性胰腺炎的疗效
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1729-1734. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9744.
根据最新亚特兰大分类法比较BISAP评分对中国急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的预测价值
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Sep;21(9):689-694. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.118. Epub 2014 May 22.
4
Comparison of Ranson, Glasgow, MOSS, SIRS, BISAP, APACHE-II, CTSI Scores, IL-6, CRP, and Procalcitonin in Predicting Severity, Organ Failure, Pancreatic Necrosis, and Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis.Ranson评分、格拉斯哥评分、MOSS评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、BISAP评分、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE-II)、CTSI评分、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)及降钙素原在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度、器官衰竭、胰腺坏死及死亡率中的比较
HPB Surg. 2013;2013:367581. doi: 10.1155/2013/367581. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
5
American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis.美国胃肠病学会指南:急性胰腺炎的管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
6
A comparison of the BISAP score and serum procalcitonin for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.BISAP 评分与血清降钙素原对预测急性胰腺炎严重程度的比较。
Korean J Intern Med. 2013 May;28(3):322-9. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2013.28.3.322. Epub 2013 May 1.
7
Evaluation of the BISAP score in predicting severity and prognoses of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients.BISAP评分对中国急性胰腺炎患者严重程度及预后的预测价值评估。
Int Surg. 2013 Jan-Mar;98(1):6-12. doi: 10.9738/0020-8868-98.1.6.
8
Usefulness of the Bedside Index for severity in acute pancreatitis in the early prediction of severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis.床边严重指数在急性胰腺炎中的应用:对急性胰腺炎严重程度和死亡率的早期预测。
Pancreas. 2013 Apr;42(3):483-7. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318267c879.
9
Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update.美国胃肠道疾病负担:2012 年更新。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-1187.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
10
Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis.比较 BISAP、Ranson's、APACHE-II 和 CTSI 评分在预测急性胰腺炎器官衰竭、并发症和死亡率中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):435-41; quiz 442. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.622. Epub 2009 Oct 27.