School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, IL, United States.
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 15;117:305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.038. Epub 2015 May 22.
The understanding of empathy from a neuroscientific perspective has recently developed quickly, with numerous functional MRI studies associating different brain regions with different components of empathy. A recent meta-analysis across 40 fMRI studies revealed that affective empathy is most often associated with increased activity in the insula, whereas cognitive empathy is most often associated with activity in the midcingulate cortex and adjacent dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (MCC/dmPFC). To date, however, it remains unclear whether individual differences in brain morphometry in these regions underlie different dispositions in affective and cognitive empathy. In order to test this hypothesis, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to examine the extent to which gray matter density predicts scores from an established empathy measure (Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy; QCAE). One hundred and seventy-six participants completed the QCAE and underwent MRI in order to acquire a high-resolution, three-dimensional T1-weighted structural scans. A factor analysis of the questionnaire scores revealed two distinct factors of empathy, affective and cognitive, which confirmed the validity of the QCAE. VBM results revealed gray matter density differences associated with the distinct components of empathy. Higher scores on affective empathy were associated with greater gray matter density in the insula cortex and higher scores of cognitive empathy were associated with greater gray matter density in the MCC/dmPFC. Taken together, these results provide validation for empathy being a multi-component construct, suggesting that affective and cognitive empathy are differentially represented in brain morphometry as well as providing convergent evidence for empathy being represented by different neural and structural correlates.
从神经科学的角度理解同理心最近发展迅速,大量功能磁共振成像研究将不同的大脑区域与同理心的不同成分联系起来。最近一项针对 40 项 fMRI 研究的荟萃分析表明,情感同理心通常与脑岛活动增加有关,而认知同理心通常与中扣带皮层和相邻背内侧前额叶皮层(MCC/dmPFC)的活动有关。然而,到目前为止,尚不清楚这些区域的大脑形态学个体差异是否是情感和认知同理心不同倾向的基础。为了检验这一假设,我们使用基于体素的形态学(VBM)来研究灰质密度是否可以预测已建立的同理心测量量表(认知和情感同理心问卷;QCAE)的分数。176 名参与者完成了 QCAE 并接受了 MRI 扫描,以获取高分辨率的三维 T1 加权结构扫描。问卷分数的因子分析揭示了同理心的两个不同因素,即情感和认知,这证实了 QCAE 的有效性。VBM 结果显示与同理心不同成分相关的灰质密度差异。情感同理心得分较高与脑岛皮层的灰质密度增加有关,而认知同理心得分较高与 MCC/dmPFC 的灰质密度增加有关。总之,这些结果为同理心是一个多成分结构提供了验证,表明情感和认知同理心在大脑形态学上有不同的表现,并为同理心由不同的神经和结构相关物来表示提供了收敛证据。