Smees Rebecca, Rinaldi Louisa J, Simner Julia
School of Psychology, Pevensey Building, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QJ, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jan 9. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06649-z.
Empathy is multifaceted, involving sharing and understanding the emotional and mental states of others. This study investigated the factor structure of the English-language version of the Empathy Quotient for Children (EQ-C; Auyeung et al., 2009), an empathy measure previously well-validated only as a global scale. We aimed to compare children with and without educational differences (i.e., Special Educational Needs & Disabilities, SEND), and explored associations between empathy and sensory sensitivities across the whole sample. Based on responses from 680 parents, we analysed data from English-speaking children aged 6-12 years, via a series of factor analyses using polychoric correlation matrices and bass-ackward analysis. Empathy domain profiling for children with SEND status (versus children without SEND status) was investigated as group differences (t tests). Sensory sensitivities were examined via associations (correlation) and net effects (regression). We identified an optimal four-factor solution (emotional empathy, social-cognitive empathy, negative interactions, antisocial behaviours), and robust higher order one-, two- and three-factor models. Children with SEND status displayed empathy differences across all four empathy domains (all p < .001). Children with greater sensory sensitivities displayed significant differences for social-cognitive empathy and negative interactions only (both p < .001). We demonstrated the potential utility of the English-language EQ-C as a domain-level measure of empathy. Our paper discusses how the domains align with traditional emotional and cognitive dimensions in adults and cross-culturally. Our empathy profiles can be used alongside global empathy measures for different groups of children, with and without educational differences and sensory sensitivities.
同理心是多方面的,包括分享和理解他人的情绪和心理状态。本研究调查了儿童同理心商数英文版本(EQ-C;Auyeung等人,2009年)的因子结构,该同理心测量工具此前仅作为一个整体量表得到了充分验证。我们旨在比较有教育差异(即特殊教育需求与残疾,SEND)和无教育差异的儿童,并在整个样本中探索同理心与感官敏感性之间的关联。基于680名家长的回复,我们通过一系列使用多相相关矩阵和反向分析的因子分析,对6至12岁说英语儿童的数据进行了分析。将有SEND状况的儿童(与无SEND状况的儿童相比)的同理心领域概况作为组间差异进行了调查(t检验)。通过关联(相关性)和净效应(回归)来检验感官敏感性。我们确定了一个最佳的四因子解决方案(情感同理心、社会认知同理心、负面互动、反社会行为),以及稳健的高阶一因子、二因子和三因子模型。有SEND状况的儿童在所有四个同理心领域均表现出同理心差异(所有p < 0.001)。感官敏感性较高的儿童仅在社会认知同理心和负面互动方面表现出显著差异(两者p < 0.001)。我们证明了英文EQ-C作为同理心领域水平测量工具的潜在效用。我们的论文讨论了这些领域如何与成人的传统情感和认知维度以及跨文化情况相一致。我们的同理心概况可与针对不同儿童群体的整体同理心测量工具一起使用,无论这些儿童有无教育差异和感官敏感性。