Hagglund K J, Roth D L, Haley W E, Alarcón G S
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.
J Rheumatol. 1989 Nov;16(11):1428-32.
The discriminant and convergent validity of several self-report measures of affective distress commonly administered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were examined. Fifty-two patients with RA completed the Arthritis Helplessness Index, the Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger's State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety Inventories, and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Depression and Anxiety Scales. Correlational and factor analyses revealed that the measures of anxiety and depression demonstrated adequate convergent validity but poor discriminant validity. Our results suggest that these measures index a general feeling of distress rather than discrete affective difficulties. The ability of these measures to assess separate problems of anxiety and depression among RA patients is questioned.
对几种常用于类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者的情感困扰自我报告测量方法的判别效度和收敛效度进行了检验。52名RA患者完成了关节炎无助感指数、贝克抑郁量表、斯皮尔伯格状态焦虑和特质焦虑量表,以及关节炎影响测量抑郁和焦虑量表。相关分析和因子分析表明,焦虑和抑郁测量方法显示出足够的收敛效度,但判别效度较差。我们的结果表明,这些测量方法反映的是一种普遍的困扰感,而非离散的情感问题。这些测量方法评估RA患者中焦虑和抑郁单独问题的能力受到质疑。