Fonseca Gabriel Paiva, Tedgren Åsa Carlsson, Reniers Brigitte, Nilsson Josef, Persson Maria, Yoriyaz Hélio, Verhaegen Frank
Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares-IPEN-CNEN/SP, São Paulo, Brazil. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6201 BN, The Netherlands.
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jun 7;60(11):4565-79. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/11/4565. Epub 2015 May 26.
Dose calculation in high dose rate brachytherapy with (192)Ir is usually based on the TG-43U1 protocol where all media are considered to be water. Several dose calculation algorithms have been developed that are capable of handling heterogeneities with two possibilities to report dose: dose-to-medium-in-medium (Dm,m) and dose-to-water-in-medium (Dw,m). The relation between Dm,m and Dw,m for (192)Ir is the main goal of this study, in particular the dependence of Dw,m on the dose calculation approach using either large cavity theory (LCT) or small cavity theory (SCT). A head and neck case was selected due to the presence of media with a large range of atomic numbers relevant to tissues and mass densities such as air, soft tissues and bone interfaces. This case was simulated using a Monte Carlo (MC) code to score: Dm,m, Dw,m (LCT), mean photon energy and photon fluence. Dw,m (SCT) was derived from MC simulations using the ratio between the unrestricted collisional stopping power of the actual medium and water. Differences between Dm,m and Dw,m (SCT or LCT) can be negligible (<1%) for some tissues e.g. muscle and significant for other tissues with differences of up to 14% for bone. Using SCT or LCT approaches leads to differences between Dw,m (SCT) and Dw,m (LCT) up to 29% for bone and 36% for teeth. The mean photon energy distribution ranges from 222 keV up to 356 keV. However, results obtained using mean photon energies are not equivalent to the ones obtained using the full, local photon spectrum. This work concludes that it is essential that brachytherapy studies clearly report the dose quantity. It further shows that while differences between Dm,m and Dw,m (SCT) mainly depend on tissue type, differences between Dm,m and Dw,m (LCT) are, in addition, significantly dependent on the local photon energy fluence spectrum which varies with distance to implanted sources.
使用铱-192(¹⁹²Ir)的高剂量率近距离放射治疗中的剂量计算通常基于TG-43U1协议,该协议将所有介质视为水。已经开发了几种剂量计算算法,这些算法能够处理不均匀性,并具有两种报告剂量的可能性:介质中对介质的剂量(Dm,m)和介质中对水的剂量(Dw,m)。本研究的主要目标是¹⁹²Ir的Dm,m和Dw,m之间的关系,特别是Dw,m对使用大腔理论(LCT)或小腔理论(SCT)的剂量计算方法的依赖性。由于存在与组织和质量密度相关的原子序数范围广泛的介质,如空气、软组织和骨界面,因此选择了一个头颈部病例。使用蒙特卡罗(MC)代码对该病例进行模拟,以计算:Dm,m、Dw,m(LCT)、平均光子能量和光子注量。Dw,m(SCT)是通过MC模拟使用实际介质与水的无限制碰撞阻止本领之比得出的。对于某些组织,如肌肉,Dm,m和Dw,m(SCT或LCT)之间的差异可以忽略不计(<1%),而对于其他组织则很显著,骨的差异高达14%。使用SCT或LCT方法会导致Dw,m(SCT)和Dw,m(LCT)之间的差异,骨高达29%,牙齿高达36%。平均光子能量分布范围从222 keV到356 keV。然而,使用平均光子能量获得的结果与使用完整的局部光子光谱获得的结果并不等效。这项工作得出结论,近距离放射治疗研究必须清楚地报告剂量量。它还表明,虽然Dm,m和Dw,m(SCT)之间的差异主要取决于组织类型,但Dm,m和Dw,m(LCT)之间的差异此外还显著取决于局部光子能量注量光谱,该光谱随距植入源的距离而变化。