Burau Viola, Overgaard Charlotte
CFK - Public Health and Quality Improvement, Olof Palmes Allé 15, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus, Bartholins Allé 7, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 May 27;15:121. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0546-8.
The large obstetric units typical of industrialised countries have come under criticism for fragmented and depersonalised care and heavy bureaucracy. Interest in midwife-led continuity models of care is growing, but knowledge about the accompanying processes of organisational change is scarce. This study focuses on midwives' role in introducing and developing caseload midwifery. Sociological studies of midwifery and organisational studies of professional groups were used to capture the strong interests of midwives in caseload midwifery and their key role together with management in negotiating organisational change.
We studied three hospitals in Denmark as arenas for negotiating the introduction and development of caseload midwifery and the processes, interests and resources involved. A qualitative multi-case design was used and the selection of hospitals aimed at maximising variance. Ten individual and 14 group interviews were conducted in spring 2013. Staff were represented by caseload midwives, ward midwives, obstetricians and health visitors, management by chief midwives and their deputies. Participants were recruited to maximise the diversity of experience. The data analysis adopted a thematic approach, using within- and across-case analysis.
The analysis revealed a highly interdependent interplay between organisational and professional projects in the change processes involved in the introduction and development of caseload midwifery. This was reflected in three ways: first, in the key role of negotiations in all phases; second, in midwives' and management's engagement in both types of projects (as evident from their interests and resources); and third in a high capacity for resolving tensions between the two projects. The ward midwives' role as a third party in organisational change further complicated the process.
For managers tasked with the introduction and development of caseload midwifery, our study underscores the importance of understanding the complexity of the underlying change processes and of activating midwives' and managers' interests and resources in addressing the challenges. Further studies of female-dominated professions such as midwifery should offer good opportunities for detailed analysis of the deep-seated interdependence of professional and organisational projects and for identifying the key dimensions of this interdependence.
工业化国家常见的大型产科单位因护理碎片化、缺乏人情味以及官僚作风严重而受到批评。对由助产士主导的连续性护理模式的兴趣日益浓厚,但关于随之而来的组织变革过程的了解却很少。本研究聚焦于助产士在引入和发展个案管理助产模式中的作用。运用助产士的社会学研究以及专业群体的组织研究,以了解助产士对个案管理助产模式的浓厚兴趣及其与管理层在协商组织变革中的关键作用。
我们将丹麦的三家医院作为协商引入和发展个案管理助产模式以及相关过程、利益和资源的场所进行研究。采用定性多案例设计,医院的选择旨在使差异最大化。2013年春季进行了10次个人访谈和14次小组访谈。参与人员包括个案管理助产士、病房助产士、产科医生和健康访视员,管理层包括首席助产士及其副手。为使经验多样性最大化而招募了参与者。数据分析采用主题分析法,运用案例内和跨案例分析。
分析显示,在引入和发展个案管理助产模式所涉及的变革过程中,组织项目和专业项目之间存在高度相互依存的相互作用。这体现在三个方面:第一,谈判在所有阶段都起着关键作用;第二,助产士和管理层参与这两类项目(从他们的利益和资源可以看出);第三,在解决这两个项目之间的紧张关系方面能力很强。病房助产士作为组织变革中的第三方所起的作用使这一过程更加复杂。
对于负责引入和发展个案管理助产模式的管理人员而言,我们的研究强调了理解潜在变革过程的复杂性以及激发助产士和管理人员应对挑战的兴趣和资源的重要性。对助产等以女性为主的职业进行进一步研究,应为详细分析专业项目和组织项目之间深层次的相互依存关系以及确定这种相互依存关系的关键维度提供良好机会。