Suppr超能文献

术前胆道引流对切除的胰腺导管腺癌长期生存的影响:一项多中心观察性研究

Impact of Preoperative Biliary Drainage on Long-Term Survival in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Observational Study.

作者信息

Uemura Kenichiro, Murakami Yoshiaki, Satoi Sohei, Sho Masayuki, Motoi Fuyuhiko, Kawai Manabu, Matsumoto Ippei, Honda Goro, Kurata Masanao, Yanagimoto Hiroaki, Nishiwada Satoshi, Fukumoto Takumi, Unno Michiakil, Yamaue Hiroki

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S1238-46. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4618-9. Epub 2015 May 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on the long-term survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

A multicenter observational study was performed using a common database of patients with resected PDAC from seven high-volume surgical institutions in Japan.

RESULTS

Of 932 patients who underwent PD for PDAC, 573 (62 %) underwent PBD, including 407 (44 %) who underwent endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) and 166 (18 %) who underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). The patients who did not undergo PBD and those who underwent EBD had a significantly better overall survival than those who underwent PTBD, with median survival times of 25.7 months (P < 0.001), 22.3 months (P = 0.001), and 16.7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that seven clinicopathologic factors, including the use of PTBD but not EBD, were independently associated with poorer overall survival. Furthermore, patients who underwent PTBD more frequently experienced peritoneal recurrence (23 %) than those who underwent EBD (10 %; P < 0.001) and those who did not undergo PBD (11 %; P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the independent risk factors for peritoneal recurrence included surgical margin status (P < 0.001) and use of PTBD (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PTBD, but not EBD, was associated with a poorer prognosis, with an increased rate of peritoneal recurrence among patients who underwent PD for PDAC.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估术前胆道引流(PBD)对接受胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者长期生存的影响。

方法

使用来自日本七家大型外科机构的切除性PDAC患者的通用数据库进行了一项多中心观察性研究。

结果

在932例接受PD治疗的PDAC患者中,573例(62%)接受了PBD,其中407例(44%)接受了内镜下胆道引流(EBD),166例(18%)接受了经皮经肝胆道引流(PTBD)。未接受PBD的患者和接受EBD的患者的总生存期明显优于接受PTBD的患者,中位生存期分别为25.7个月(P<0.001)、22.3个月(P = 0.001)和16.7个月。多变量分析显示,包括使用PTBD而非EBD在内的七个临床病理因素与较差的总生存期独立相关。此外,接受PTBD的患者比接受EBD的患者(10%;P<0.001)和未接受PBD的患者(11%;P = 0.001)更频繁地发生腹膜复发(23%)。多变量分析表明,腹膜复发的独立危险因素包括手术切缘状态(P<0.001)和PTBD的使用(P = 0.004)。

结论

使用PTBD而非EBD与较差的预后相关,在接受PD治疗的PDAC患者中腹膜复发率增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验