• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牧场中的草料选择:对牛采食行为和生产性能的影响。

Forage choice in pasturelands: Influence on cattle foraging behavior and performance.

作者信息

Villalba J J, Cabassu R, Gunter S A

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2015 Apr;93(4):1729-40. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8667.

DOI:10.2527/jas.2014-8667
PMID:26020195
Abstract

We determined if combinations of adjacent pastures of 3 forage species led to complementary relationships that influenced animal behavior and performance over monocultures. Grazing bouts, behavioral levels of activity, blood urea N (BUN), chemical composition of feces, BW, and herbage biomass before and after grazing were monitored when beef calves strip-grazed 3 replications of 4 treatments from June 14 through August 23, 2013 (9 animals/treatment). Animals grazed monocultures of: 1) tall fescue (TF), 2) alfalfa (ALF), 3) sainfoin (SAN), or 4) a choice of strips of forages TF, ALF, and SAN (CHOICE). The lowest and greatest incidence of foraging bouts occurred for cattle in CHOICE and SAN, respectively (P < 0.01). Animals in CHOICE grazed SAN > ALF > TF (P < 0.01). Animals on TF and CHOICE took greater number of steps than animals grazing a monocultures of either legume (P = 0.01). Calves in TF had lower BUN (P < 0.01) and fecal CP concentration (P < 0.01) than calves grazing the remaining treatments, whereas animals in SAN showed the greatest concentrations of fecal CP (P < 0.01). Fecal NDF concentration was the greatest for animals grazing TF and the lowest for animals grazing SAN (P < 0.01), whereas fecal ADF concentration was greater for animals grazing TF and SAN than for animals grazing CHOICE and ALF (P = 0.02). Calcium, Mg, and Zn concentrations were the lowest in feces from calves grazing TF and the greatest for calves grazing a monoculture of either legume (P < 0.05). When averaging both periods, animals grazing SAN, ALF, or CHOICE gained more BW than animals grazing TF (P < 0.01). Thus, calves in CHOICE incorporated tall fescue into their diets, were more active, and displayed a lower number of grazing bouts than calves grazing monoculture of either legume. Herbage diversity may lead to levels of ADG comparable to legume monocultures with the potential benefit of maintaining plant species diversity in pasturelands.

摘要

我们研究了三种饲草物种相邻牧场的组合是否会产生互补关系,从而影响动物行为及与单一栽培相比的生产性能。2013年6月14日至8月23日,肉牛犊对4种处理进行3次重复条带放牧(每个处理9头动物)时,监测了放牧回合、行为活动水平、血尿素氮(BUN)、粪便化学成分、体重以及放牧前后的牧草生物量。动物放牧单一栽培的:1)高羊茅(TF),2)苜蓿(ALF),3)红豆草(SAN),或4)高羊茅、苜蓿和红豆草条带的组合(CHOICE)。采食回合发生率最低和最高的分别是CHOICE组和SAN组的牛(P < 0.01)。CHOICE组的动物采食红豆草 > 苜蓿 > 高羊茅(P < 0.01)。TF组和CHOICE组的动物比放牧单一豆科植物的动物走的步数更多(P = 0.01)。TF组的犊牛血尿素氮(P < 0.01)和粪便粗蛋白浓度(P < 0.)低于放牧其他处理的犊牛,而SAN组动物的粪便粗蛋白浓度最高(P < 0.01)。放牧TF的动物粪便中性洗涤纤维浓度最高,放牧SAN的动物最低(P < 0.01),而放牧TF和SAN的动物粪便酸性洗涤纤维浓度高于放牧CHOICE和ALF的动物(P = 0.02)。放牧TF的犊牛粪便中钙、镁和锌的浓度最低,放牧单一豆科植物的犊牛最高(P < 0.05)。平均两个时期,放牧SAN、ALF或CHOICE的动物比放牧TF的动物体重增加更多(P < 0.01)。因此,与放牧单一豆科植物的犊牛相比,CHOICE组的犊牛将高羊茅纳入其日粮,更活跃,采食回合次数更少。牧草多样性可能导致与豆科单一栽培相当的平均日增重水平,并有可能在牧场维持植物物种多样性。

相似文献

1
Forage choice in pasturelands: Influence on cattle foraging behavior and performance.牧场中的草料选择:对牛采食行为和生产性能的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2015 Apr;93(4):1729-40. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8667.
2
Importance of grass-legume choices on cattle grazing behavior, performance, and meat characteristics.禾本科植物与豆科植物的选择对牛放牧行为、生产性能及肉品质特性的重要性。
J Anim Sci. 2014 May;92(5):2309-24. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7297. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
3
Grazing diverse combinations of tanniferous and nontanniferous legumes: implications for foraging behavior, performance, and hair cortisol in beef cattle.放牧不同组合的单宁和非单宁豆科植物:对肉牛觅食行为、性能和皮质酮的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Nov 1;99(11). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab291.
4
Cattle preferences differ when endophyte-infected tall fescue, birdsfoot trefoil, and alfalfa are grazed in different sequences.当内生真菌感染的高羊茅、三叶草和紫花苜蓿以不同顺序放牧时,牛的偏好会有所不同。
J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):1131-7. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2741. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
5
Phytochemical complementarities among endophyte-infected tall fescue, reed canarygrass, birdsfoot trefoil and alfalfa affect cattle foraging.内生真菌感染的高羊茅、雀麦、三叶鬼针草和紫花苜蓿之间的植物化学互补性会影响牛的觅食行为。
Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):676-82. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001996.
6
Tannin-containing legumes and forage diversity influence foraging behavior, diet digestibility, and nitrogen excretion by lambs1,2.单宁含量高的豆类和饲料多样性会影响羔羊的采食行为、日粮消化率和氮排泄1,2。
J Anim Sci. 2019 Sep 3;97(9):3994-4009. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz246.
7
Grazing diverse combinations of tanniferous and non-tanniferous legumes: Implications for beef cattle performance and environmental impact.放牧不同组合的单宁和非单宁豆科植物:对肉牛性能和环境影响的意义。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 1;746:140788. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140788. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
8
Effects of co-grazing dairy heifers with goats on animal performance, dry matter yield, and pasture forage composition.奶牛和山羊混养对动物性能、干物质产量和牧场草料组成的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4467-77. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4643. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
9
Interaction of breed type and endophyte-infected tall fescue on milk production and quality in beef cattle.品种类型与内生真菌感染的高羊茅对肉牛产奶量和奶品质的相互作用。
J Anim Sci. 2010 Aug;88(8):2802-11. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2214. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
10
Performance of growing cattle grazing stockpiled Jesup tall fescue with varying endophyte status.不同内生真菌状态的牛尾草放牧育肥牛的生产性能
J Anim Sci. 2009 Mar;87(3):1034-41. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-0977. Epub 2008 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Varied diets: implications for lamb performance, rumen characteristics, total antioxidant status, and welfare.多样化的饮食:对羔羊性能、瘤胃特性、总抗氧化状态和福利的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Dec 1;99(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab334.
2
Grazing diverse combinations of tanniferous and nontanniferous legumes: implications for foraging behavior, performance, and hair cortisol in beef cattle.放牧不同组合的单宁和非单宁豆科植物:对肉牛觅食行为、性能和皮质酮的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Nov 1;99(11). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab291.
3
Functional diversity vs. monotony: the effect of a multiforage diet as opposed to a single forage diet on animal intake, performance, welfare, and urinary nitrogen excretion.
功能多样性与单一性:与单一草料饮食相比,多样化草料饮食对动物采食量、生产性能、福利及尿氮排泄的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2021 May 1;99(5). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab058.
4
How Dietary Diversity Enhances Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being in Grazing Ruminants.饮食多样性如何提升放牧反刍动物的享乐主义和幸福主义幸福感。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Apr 15;7:191. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00191. eCollection 2020.
5
Herbage intake of dairy cows in mixed sequential grazing with breeding ewes as followers.以繁殖母羊为跟随者的混合顺序放牧中奶牛的牧草摄入量。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018 Mar;50(3):531-536. doi: 10.1007/s11250-017-1464-8. Epub 2017 Nov 7.