Palmgren Per J, Sundberg Tobias, Laksov Klara Bolander
J Chiropr Educ. 2015 Oct;29(2):110-26. doi: 10.7899/JCE-14-37. Epub 2015 May 29.
The aim of the study was twofold: (1) to compare the perceived educational environment at 2 points in time and (2) to longitudinally examine potential changes in perceptions of the educational environment over time.
The validated Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM), a 50-item, self-administered Likert-type inventory, was used in this prospective study. Employing convenience sampling, undergraduate chiropractic students were investigated at 2 points in time: 2009 (n = 124) and 2012 (n = 127). An analysis of 2 matching samples was performed on 27% (n = 34) of the respondents in 2009.
A total of 251 students (79%) completed the inventory, 83% (n = 124) in 2009 and 75% (n = 127) in 2012. The overall DREEM scores in both years were excellent: 156 (78%) and 153 (77%), respectively. The students' perceptions of teachers differed significantly between the 2 cohort years, decreasing from 77% to 73%. Three items received deprived scores: limited support for stressed students, authoritarian teachers, and an overemphasis on factual learning; the latter significantly decreased in 2012. In the longitudinal sample these items also displayed scores below the expected mean.
Students viewed the educational environment as excellent both in 2009 and 2012. The perceptions of teachers declined with time; however, this could be attributed to teachers' new roles. Certain aspects of the educational environment factored prominently during the comparative points in time, as well as longitudinally, and these ought to be further investigated and addressed to provide an enhanced educational environment.
本研究有两个目的:(1)比较两个时间点的感知教育环境;(2)纵向考察教育环境感知随时间的潜在变化。
本前瞻性研究使用了经过验证的邓迪教育环境量表(DREEM),这是一份50项的自填式李克特量表。采用便利抽样法,在两个时间点对本科脊椎按摩疗法专业学生进行调查:2009年(n = 124)和2012年(n = 127)。对2009年27%(n = 34)的受访者进行了两个匹配样本的分析。
共有251名学生(79%)完成了量表填写,2009年为83%(n = 124),2012年为75%(n = 127)。两年的DREEM总体得分均为优秀:分别为156分(78%)和153分(77%)。两个队列年份学生对教师的看法存在显著差异,从77%降至73%。有三个项目得分较低:对压力大的学生支持有限、教师专制以及过于强调事实性学习;后者在2012年显著下降。在纵向样本中,这些项目的得分也低于预期均值。
学生在2009年和2012年都认为教育环境优秀。对教师的看法随时间下降;然而,这可能归因于教师的新角色。教育环境的某些方面在比较时间点以及纵向方面都很突出,应该进一步调查和解决这些问题,以提供更好的教育环境。