Suppr超能文献

预测排水农田磷素流失模型的适用性:综述

Applicability of models to predict phosphorus losses in drained fields: a review.

作者信息

Radcliffe David E, Reid D Keith, Blombäck Karin, Bolster Carl H, Collick Amy S, Easton Zachary M, Francesconi Wendy, Fuka Daniel R, Johnsson Holger, King Kevin, Larsbo Mats, Youssef Mohamed A, Mulkey Alisha S, Nelson Nathan O, Persson Kristian, Ramirez-Avila John J, Schmieder Frank, Smith Douglas R

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2015 Mar;44(2):614-28. doi: 10.2134/jeq2014.05.0220.

Abstract

Most phosphorus (P) modeling studies of water quality have focused on surface runoff loses. However, a growing number of experimental studies have shown that P losses can occur in drainage water from artificially drained fields. In this review, we assess the applicability of nine models to predict this type of P loss. A model of P movement in artificially drained systems will likely need to account for the partitioning of water and P into runoff, macropore flow, and matrix flow. Within the soil profile, sorption and desorption of dissolved P and filtering of particulate P will be important. Eight models are reviewed (ADAPT, APEX, DRAINMOD, HSPF, HYDRUS, ICECREAMDB, PLEASE, and SWAT) along with P Indexes. Few of the models are designed to address P loss in drainage waters. Although the SWAT model has been used extensively for modeling P loss in runoff and includes tile drain flow, P losses are not simulated in tile drain flow. ADAPT, HSPF, and most P Indexes do not simulate flow to tiles or drains. DRAINMOD simulates drains but does not simulate P. The ICECREAMDB model from Sweden is an exception in that it is designed specifically for P losses in drainage water. This model seems to be a promising, parsimonious approach in simulating critical processes, but it needs to be tested. Field experiments using a nested, paired research design are needed to improve P models for artificially drained fields. Regardless of the model used, it is imperative that uncertainty in model predictions be assessed.

摘要

大多数关于水质的磷(P)模型研究都集中在地表径流损失上。然而,越来越多的实验研究表明,人工排水农田的排水中会出现磷损失。在本综述中,我们评估了九种模型预测此类磷损失的适用性。人工排水系统中磷迁移的模型可能需要考虑水和磷在径流、大孔隙流和基质流中的分配。在土壤剖面内,溶解态磷的吸附和解吸以及颗粒态磷的过滤将很重要。本文综述了八种模型(ADAPT、APEX、DRAINMOD、HSPF、HYDRUS、ICECREAMDB、PLEASE和SWAT)以及磷指数。这些模型中很少有专门设计用于解决排水中磷损失问题的。尽管SWAT模型已广泛用于模拟径流中的磷损失,且包括瓦管排水流,但未对瓦管排水流中的磷损失进行模拟。ADAPT、HSPF和大多数磷指数都不模拟流向瓦管或排水渠的水流。DRAINMOD模拟排水渠,但不模拟磷。瑞典的ICECREAMDB模型是个例外,它专门针对排水中的磷损失设计。该模型在模拟关键过程方面似乎是一种有前景的、简洁的方法,但需要进行测试。需要采用嵌套、配对研究设计的田间实验来改进人工排水农田的磷模型。无论使用哪种模型,评估模型预测中的不确定性都至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验