• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明尼苏达磷流失指数性能评估。

Evaluation of Minnesota Phosphorus Loss Index performance.

作者信息

Reitmeier Heidi, Pease Lindsay, Loss Peyton, Radatz Tim

机构信息

Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, Northwest Research & Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Crookston, Minnesota, USA.

Minnesota Discovery Farms, Minnesota Agricultural Water Resources Center, Eagan, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):827-837. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20635. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1002/jeq2.20635
PMID:39380130
Abstract

Supported by the National Phosphorus (P) Research Project led by Dr. Andrew Sharpley, Minnesota developed its statewide P-Index, the Minnesota P Loss Index (MNPI), to manage critical source areas of agricultural P. The MNPI has remained unchanged since its last revision in 2006. The overall goal of this study was to critically evaluate the MNPI to determine, in the parlance of Sharpley, if the MNPI remains "directionally and magnitudinally correct." Observed P loss from 67 site-years of annual edge-of-field data was compared with MNPI-predicted P loss. Our assessment indicates that MNPI performance is directionally correct: it correctly ranks fields that are more at risk than others. The MNPI performed better in years with high-intensity rainfall events. Averaging MNPI assessment across multiple years of data input, along with minor adjustments to the calculation algorithm, improved the robustness of MNPI estimates. Continued re-evaluation of the MNPI will ensure that this important tool for nutrient management is properly evaluating P loss potential. This study reflects Dr. Sharpley's decades-long effort to improve and revise P indices so that they reflect advances in the science and management of agricultural P.

摘要

在由安德鲁·夏普利博士领导的国家磷(P)研究项目的支持下,明尼苏达州制定了全州范围的磷指数——明尼苏达磷流失指数(MNPI),以管理农业磷的关键源区。自2006年上次修订以来,MNPI一直保持不变。本研究的总体目标是对MNPI进行严格评估,用夏普利的话来说,就是确定MNPI是否仍然“在方向和量级上正确”。将67个站点年的田间边缘年度数据观测到的磷流失与MNPI预测的磷流失进行了比较。我们的评估表明,MNPI的表现方向正确:它能正确地对风险较高的田地进行排名。MNPI在降雨强度大的年份表现更好。对多年数据输入的MNPI评估进行平均,以及对计算算法进行微小调整,提高了MNPI估计的稳健性。持续对MNPI进行重新评估将确保这个营养管理的重要工具能够正确评估磷流失潜力。这项研究反映了夏普利博士数十年来为改进和修订磷指数所做的努力,以便它们能够反映农业磷科学和管理方面的进展。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Minnesota Phosphorus Loss Index performance.明尼苏达磷流失指数性能评估。
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):827-837. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20635. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
2
Balancing agriculture and environment: Andrew Sharpley's nutrient, soil, and water management legacy.平衡农业与环境:安德鲁·夏普利于养分、土壤和水资源管理方面的遗产
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):770-776. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20547. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
3
A short history of the phosphorus index and Andrew Sharpley's contributions from inception through development and implementation.磷指数简史及安德鲁·沙普利从创立到发展与实施阶段的贡献。
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):788-797. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20535. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
A review of the development and implementation of the critical source area concept: A reflection of Andrew Sharpley's role in improving water quality.关键源区概念的发展与实施综述:对安德鲁·夏普利于改善水质方面作用的反思
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):807-826. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20551. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
5
The importance of consensus science to managing phosphorus in the environment: SERA-17 and the legacy of Andrew Sharpley.共识科学对环境中磷管理的重要性:SERA - 17与安德鲁·夏普ley的遗产。
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):798-806. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20546. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
6
Toward better targeting of mitigation measures for reducing phosphorus losses from land to water: Andrew Sharpley's legacy in Norway and Sweden.为更好地针对减少磷从陆地流失到水体的缓解措施:安德鲁·夏普利于挪威和瑞典留下的遗产。
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):777-787. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20558. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Phosphorus distributions in alluvial soils of the Lower Mississippi River Basin: A case of dual legacies.密西西比河下游流域冲积土中的磷分布:一个双重遗留问题的案例。
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):870-881. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20623. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
9
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
10
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.

引用本文的文献

1
Through the lens of phosphorus: The legacy of Andrew Sharpley.透过磷元素的视角:安德鲁·夏普利的遗产
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):763-769. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.70032. Epub 2025 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
A short history of the phosphorus index and Andrew Sharpley's contributions from inception through development and implementation.磷指数简史及安德鲁·沙普利从创立到发展与实施阶段的贡献。
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):788-797. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20535. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
Near-Surface Soils as a Source of Phosphorus in Snowmelt Runoff from Cropland.农田融雪径流水中近地表土壤作为磷的来源。
J Environ Qual. 2019 Jul;48(4):921-930. doi: 10.2134/jeq2019.04.0155.
3
Analyzing Within-County Hydrogeomorphological Characteristics as a Precursor to Phosphorus Index Modifications.
分析县内水文地貌特征作为磷指数修正的前兆
J Environ Qual. 2017 Nov;46(6):1365-1371. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.10.0416.
4
Comparing an Annual and a Daily Time-Step Model for Predicting Field-Scale Phosphorus Loss.比较用于预测田间尺度磷素流失的年度和每日时间步长模型。
J Environ Qual. 2017 Nov;46(6):1314-1322. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.04.0159.
5
Edge-Of-Field Evaluation of the Ohio Phosphorus Risk Index.俄亥俄州磷风险指数的场外评估
J Environ Qual. 2017 Nov;46(6):1306-1313. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.05.0198.
6
Assessing Coastal Plain Risk Indices for Subsurface Phosphorus Loss.评估沿海平原地下磷流失的风险指数。
J Environ Qual. 2017 Nov;46(6):1270-1286. doi: 10.2134/jeq2017.03.0102.
7
Evaluation of Phosphorus Site Assessment Tools: Lessons from the USA.磷位点评估工具的评估:来自美国的经验教训。
J Environ Qual. 2017 Nov;46(6):1250-1256. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.11.0427.
8
Increased Soluble Phosphorus Loads to Lake Erie: Unintended Consequences of Conservation Practices?流入伊利湖的可溶性磷负荷增加:保护措施的意外后果?
J Environ Qual. 2017 Jan;46(1):123-132. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.07.0248.
9
Comparison of Contaminant Transport in Agricultural Drainage Water and Urban Stormwater Runoff.农业排水与城市雨水径流中污染物迁移的比较
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 8;11(12):e0167834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167834. eCollection 2016.
10
Assessment and Synthesis of 50 Years of Published Drainage Phosphorus Losses.50年已发表的排水磷流失评估与综合分析
J Environ Qual. 2016 Sep;45(5):1467-1477. doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.12.0593.