Geyer Johannes, Korfhage Thorben
German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin, Germany.
Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Berlin, Germany.
Health Econ. 2015 Sep;24(9):1178-91. doi: 10.1002/hec.3200. Epub 2015 May 29.
In Germany, individuals in need of long-term care receive support through benefits of the long-term care insurance. A central goal of the insurance is to support informal care provided by family members. Care recipients can choose between benefits in kind (formal home care services) and benefits in cash. From a budgetary perspective, family care is often considered a cost-saving alternative to formal home care and to stationary nursing care. However, the opportunity costs resulting from reduced labor supply of the carer are often overlooked. We focus on the labor supply decision of family carers and the incentives set by the long-term care insurance. We estimate a structural model of labor supply and the choice of benefits of family carers. We find that benefits in kind have small positive effects on labor supply. Labor supply elasticities of cash benefits are larger and negative. If both types of benefits increase, negative labor supply effects are offset to a large extent. However, the average effect is significantly negative.
在德国,需要长期护理的个人通过长期护理保险福利获得支持。该保险的一个核心目标是支持家庭成员提供的非正式护理。护理接受者可以在实物福利(正规家庭护理服务)和现金福利之间进行选择。从预算角度来看,家庭护理通常被视为正规家庭护理和住院护理的一种节省成本的替代方案。然而,护理人员劳动力供应减少所产生的机会成本往往被忽视。我们关注家庭护理人员的劳动力供应决策以及长期护理保险所设定的激励措施。我们估计了家庭护理人员劳动力供应和福利选择的结构模型。我们发现,实物福利对劳动力供应有微小的积极影响。现金福利的劳动力供应弹性更大且为负。如果两种福利都增加,负面的劳动力供应影响在很大程度上会被抵消。然而,平均影响显著为负。