• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨远端骨折的固定:膝关节活动度的恢复。

Fixation of distal femoral fractures: Restoration of the knee motion.

作者信息

Massoud Elsayed Ibraheem Elsayed

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic, Sohag Teaching Hospital, General Organization for Teaching Hospitals and Institutes, Sohag, Egypt.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 May;21(3):197-203. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.00490.

DOI:10.5505/tjtes.2015.00490
PMID:26033653
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most of healed lower femoral fractures resulted in various degree of loss of the knee motion. Flexion deficit is a serious problem for the Eastern persons that are where squatting and sitting on the ground are necessary for daily activities. The aims of this study were to compare outcomes of using condylar buttress plate and dynamic condylar screw (DCS) in treatment of distal femoral fractures. Secondly, we present our clinical experience for optimizing the technical application of the studied implants.

METHODS

Two groups (plate and DCS) of 57 patients were treated for 59 lower femoral fractures with condylar buttress plate or DCS and followed prospectively for 24 months.

RESULTS

Plate group reported adequate reduction in 67% and varus angulation in 13.3% of the fractures. DCS group reported adequate reduction in 72.4% and posterior angulations in 17% of the fractures. Other reasons for inadequacy of reduction were reported in both groups. Full knee motion range was achieved in 50% of plate group and in 55% of DCS group. 75% and 90% satisfactory functional outcomes were reported in the plate and DCS groups respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both implants nearly achieved equal results concerning restoration of knee motion range. The condylar buttress plate and DCS are liable for technical optimization.

摘要

背景

大多数已愈合的股骨下段骨折会导致不同程度的膝关节活动丧失。对于东方人来说,屈曲受限是一个严重的问题,因为在日常活动中蹲和坐在地上是必要的。本研究的目的是比较使用髁支持钢板和动力髁螺钉(DCS)治疗股骨远端骨折的疗效。其次,我们介绍我们在优化所研究植入物技术应用方面的临床经验。

方法

两组(钢板组和DCS组)共57例患者接受了59例股骨下段骨折的治疗,分别使用髁支持钢板或DCS,并进行了为期24个月的前瞻性随访。

结果

钢板组报告67%的骨折复位良好,13.3%的骨折出现内翻成角。DCS组报告72.4%的骨折复位良好,17%的骨折出现后凸成角。两组均报告了复位不充分的其他原因。钢板组50%的患者和DCS组55%的患者实现了膝关节全活动范围。钢板组和DCS组分别报告了75%和90%的满意功能结果。

结论

两种植入物在恢复膝关节活动范围方面几乎取得了相同的结果。髁支持钢板和DCS都需要进行技术优化。

相似文献

1
Fixation of distal femoral fractures: Restoration of the knee motion.股骨远端骨折的固定:膝关节活动度的恢复。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 May;21(3):197-203. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.00490.
2
Condylar buttress plate versus fixed angle condylar blade plate versus dynamic condylar screw for supracondylar intra-articular distal femoral fractures.髁支撑钢板、固定角度髁钢板与动力髁螺钉治疗股骨髁上关节内远端骨折的比较
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010 Apr;18(1):35-8. doi: 10.1177/230949901001800108.
3
Unicondylar fractures of the distal femur.股骨远端单髁骨折。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Dec;100(8):873-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
4
Are Locking Constructs in Distal Femoral Fractures Always Best? A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Less Invasive Stabilization System With the Minimally Invasive Dynamic Condylar Screw System.股骨远端骨折中的锁定结构总是最佳选择吗?一项比较微创稳定系统与微创动力髁螺钉系统的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jan;30(1):e1-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000450.
5
Bridge plate osteosynthesis using dynamic condylar screw (DCS) or retrograde intramedullary supracondylar nail (RIMSN) in the treatment of distal femoral fractures: comparison of two methods in a prospective randomized study.使用动力髁螺钉(DCS)或逆行髓内髁上钉(RIMSN)进行桥接钢板接骨术治疗股骨远端骨折:一项前瞻性随机研究中两种方法的比较
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Mar;15(2):148-53.
6
Outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) plate system: a single centre experience spanning 15 years.动力髁螺钉(DCS)钢板系统治疗股骨远端骨折的疗效:跨越 15 年的单中心经验。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Apr 14;38:363. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.363.27524. eCollection 2021.
7
Treatment of distal femoral fracture by minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis: comparison between the dynamic condylar screw and the less invasive stabilization system.微创经皮钢板接骨术治疗股骨远端骨折:动力髁螺钉与微创稳定系统的比较
J Trauma. 2009 Oct;67(4):719-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819d9cb2.
8
[Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate].使用锁定加压钢板治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围髁上骨折的接骨术
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Dec;76(6):473-8.
9
The mechanics of internal fixation of fractures of the distal femur: a comparison of the condylar screw (DCS) with the condylar plate (CP).股骨远端骨折的内固定力学:髁螺钉(DCS)与髁钢板(CP)的比较。
Injury. 1999;30 Suppl 1:A31-9. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00124-2.
10
Blade-plate fixation for distal femoral fractures: a case-control study.股骨远端骨折的接骨板固定:一项病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Sep;100(5):555-60. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
[Current status and progress of clinical research on distal femoral fractures].[股骨远端骨折的临床研究现状与进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 15;32(2):242-247. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201704132.