Suppr超能文献

皮下注射聚乙二醇化干扰素β-1a与其他注射疗法治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疗效网络荟萃分析及安全性评估

A Network Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Evaluation of Safety of Subcutaneous Pegylated Interferon Beta-1a versus Other Injectable Therapies for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

作者信息

Tolley Keith, Hutchinson Michael, You Xiaojun, Wang Ping, Sperling Bjoern, Taneja Ankush, Siddiqui Mohammed Kashif, Kinter Elizabeth

机构信息

Tolley Health Economics Ltd., Buxton, United Kingdom.

St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 3;10(6):e0127960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127960. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Subcutaneous pegylated interferon beta-1a (peginterferon beta-1a [PEG-IFN]) 125 μg every two or four weeks has been studied in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients in the pivotal Phase 3 ADVANCE trial. In the absence of direct comparative evidence, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to provide an indirect assessment of the relative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of PEG-IFN versus other injectable RRMS therapies. Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, and conference proceedings from relevant annual symposia were hand-searched. Included studies were randomized controlled trials evaluating ≥1 first-line treatments including interferon beta-1a 30, 44, and 22 μg, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate in patients with RRMS. Studies were included based on a pre-specified protocol and extracted by a team of independent reviewers and information scientists, utilizing criteria from NICE and IQWiG. In line with ADVANCE findings, NMA results support that PEG-IFN every 2 weeks significantly reduced annualized relapse rate, and 3- and 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) versus placebo. There was numerical trend favoring PEG-IFN every 2 weeks versus other IFNs assessed for annualized relapse rate, and versus all other injectables for 3- and 6-month CDP (6-month CDP was significantly reduced versus IFN beta-1a 30 μg). The safety and tolerability profile of PEG-IFN beta-1a 125 μg every 2 weeks was consistent with that of other evaluated treatments. Study limitations for the NMA include variant definitions of relapse and other systematic differences across trials, assumptions that populations were sufficiently similar, and inability to perform NMA of adverse events. With similar efficacy compared to other RRMS treatments in terms of annualized relapse rate and 3- and 6-month CDP, a promising safety profile, and up to 93% reduction in number of injections (which may improve adherence), PEG-IFN every 2 weeks offers a valuable alternative treatment option for patients with RRMS.

摘要

皮下注射聚乙二醇化干扰素β-1a(聚乙二醇干扰素β-1a [PEG-IFN]),每两周或四周注射125μg,已在复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者的关键3期ADVANCE试验中进行了研究。在缺乏直接对比证据的情况下,进行了一项网状荟萃分析(NMA),以间接评估PEG-IFN与其他RRMS注射疗法相比的相对疗效、安全性和耐受性。在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统检索,并对手检相关年度研讨会的会议记录进行了检索。纳入的研究为随机对照试验,评估了RRMS患者中≥1种一线治疗方法,包括30、44和22μg的干扰素β-1a、干扰素β-1b和醋酸格拉替雷。研究根据预先指定的方案纳入,并由一组独立评审员和信息科学家提取,采用英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)和德国卫生技术评估机构(IQWiG)的标准。与ADVANCE研究结果一致,NMA结果支持每2周一次的PEG-IFN与安慰剂相比,显著降低年化复发率以及3个月和6个月确诊的残疾进展(CDP)。在年化复发率方面,每2周一次的PEG-IFN与评估的其他干扰素相比,以及在3个月和6个月CDP方面与所有其他注射药物相比,有数值上的优势趋势(6个月CDP与30μg干扰素β-1a相比显著降低)。每2周一次的125μg PEG-IFNβ-1a的安全性和耐受性与其他评估治疗方法一致。NMA的研究局限性包括复发的不同定义以及各试验之间的其他系统差异、对人群足够相似的假设,以及无法对不良事件进行NMA。在年化复发率以及3个月和6个月CDP方面与其他RRMS治疗方法具有相似疗效,安全性良好,注射次数最多可减少93%(这可能提高依从性),每2周一次的PEG-IFN为RRMS患者提供了一种有价值的替代治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941c/4454514/da54681e6dbf/pone.0127960.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验